Has DUH-bya and his criminal administration taken our great country hostage?

Question

Answer in any context that you wish.

Answer 1

Yes. Clearly stated by Bush himself:

"And so, in my State of the — my State of the Union — or state — my speech to the nation, whatever you want to call it, speech to the nation — I asked Americans to give 4,000 years — 4,000 hours over the next — the rest of your life — of service to America. That's what I asked — 4,000 hours." —George W. Bush, Bridgeport, Conn., April 9, 2002'
By "service to America" he means buying into his flawed ideology or risk being targeted as a terrorist.

Answer 2

Actually the USA was taken hostage during the cold war. During the fifties, civil defense was disbanded and our government held us in front of itself like a helpless old lady between the USSR and itself and said,"Go ahead shoot your missiles. All you will do is kill all these people and what good is that." So they held their fire until the Reagan administration, when he called their bluffs and the wall fell down. Was Reagen's astrologer a democrat or republican?

Answer 3

curiously you have forgotten. properly to start up we went for one reason 9/11, than he went down hill we could desire to continuously have executed what he stated on the very initiating ask your self and awe the crap out of the towel wearing allah screaming cowards. Now in case you think of that I believe Bush your a million/2 impressive and a million/2 incorrect i wanted to bypass over there and kick those cowardly sandbag butt head impressive the place it hurts the main for killing all of those on 9/11. And Bush did no longer throw our u . s . under a bus, Congress did, Congress is the only one that passes rules, Bush can Veto yet whilst congress needs all of it they could desire to do is get 2/3 votes to override the veto, Congress are people who ok'ed all the bailouts they are people who initiates any investigations additionally they are people who stated specific to the Iraq investment. How Bush cope with the Iraq undertaking now I completely disagree, he began something that he replaced into no longer desirous to end impressive. we've have been given to stay there until the pastime is executed and executed impressive or we could could desire to bypass back or we could have yet another 9/11.

Answer 4

Well, that is a slight exaggeration. Most of us are able to ignore him most of the time, and that is a comfort. But I feel your frustration. It does seem as though a president ought to have a little more substance to him than being the party speech-maker. And not a very good one at that. [Second thought; would we want him to be a better speech-maker? That is, after all, much of why Adolf caused such trouble; he WAS a good speech-maker, alas.]

Answer 5

No he hasn't. President Bush has done the hardest thing that any president can do and that is to follow what he believes is best for this country. He did not listen to polls so that he could stay popular with the people. I believe when we look at 20 years from now, he will be looked upon as a Great President and could even become one of the Greatest.

Answer 6

Nope. Take that in any context you wish.

Answer 7

Not as long as you have a stock pile of fire arms and ammo!
water and peanut butter would be helpful too!

Answer 8

This started way before Dubya got into office, his administration has just proved to be far inferior at concealing it.

Answer 9

He's a fascist who does not believe in law or the Constitution! He does what he wants, so we are pretty much a hostage for the next 2 years, unless we can get him impeached!

Answer 10

Noooo, but IF they do, I nominate you as the first prisoner. There may be room at Gitmo for you now, if you are interested.