i need desperately help. i'm stuck here in their 2006. i can't return to my future through the 6th dimensional time gate!! i did all things all right and followed the usual procedure - i positioned the tachyon accelerator so that it could emit a steady tachyon stream onto the super dense gravity lens thus refracting the stream itself along the temporal axis - and emerged in the positano grotto, italy, we'd chosen at the labs. then i lived for a couple of months in the city they call neaples and performed all the experiments i was instructed to, but when i got back to the grotto and trasnsmitted a signal via my tachyon pulse emitter, which should have been detected by our time gate operators at the other side of the temporal aperture, nothing happened and the gateway didn't materialize!!
i know that once a timegate is closed, the link is lost forever, but my message is directed to my future future, hoping that the time technology will have evolved so that i can be rescued...
Additional Details
i'm expecting (and hoping...) somebody at Time Technologies will read my help call in quite a far future, at least 15 or 20 years since i left for 2006 (i'm a bit confused with tense usage...). i know that in my "present" time (your future) QC (quantum computers) are going through everything that has appeared on the internet in search of anomalies that might point to some evidence of EW (everett worlds) surfacing - as we will call them. i know, it sounds so complicated...but, really, it isn't. if a QC is alerted by this message, he (they're conscious by now...i mean, in my future) will transmit it to a human being...ah, god, what made me get into this trouble!
2006-09-19 03:28:38 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
You aren't gonna get all 12 monkeys on us, are you?
2006-09-19 03:37:23 · answer #1 · answered by cynthetiq 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hope you researched your family history....you don't want to contaminate or alter it's natual course through history.
If you do you may not exist to ask this question.
You also may want to make sure you live the homeless life and not interact with anyone.
Become a recluse in the streets or forests.
2006-09-19 10:43:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Harry Turtledove, S.M. Stirling
2006-09-19 10:40:10 · answer #3 · answered by salaamrashaad 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ok so you are a geek that has watched far too much star trek but does not understand current thinking about space time and warpages / fluctuations in it.
How much time did you spend coming up with this garbage?
Why did you bother?
Did you expect people to find it funny?
Ok so there are probably some other overly geeky trecky fans that it might amuse but it is far too geeky for the general populous to find amusing. Besides you used some long words that an American audience may struggle with.
All in all a waste of time (much like this response)
2006-09-19 10:34:46 · answer #4 · answered by StoneWeasel 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I could get you back (forward) to 2285, but the 2100s are off-limits for me after that incident with the giraffe, tacheyon acclerator and the Doc's Delorian.
2006-09-19 10:47:33 · answer #5 · answered by sarcasticquotemarks 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes there is but after we read your question we fell asleep of boredom. Then are blueprints for your tacky, gravity, density thing were nicked. Please stay where you are as we have immortal properties so it will take about 100 years to fix. Damn you'll be dead by then ooooppppsss sorry
2006-09-19 10:33:27 · answer #6 · answered by alismudge 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's pretty good. If you want it to be more convincing, you should not have the general readership as your audience though. We would not be the 'who' you are talking to and our reading would be incidental.
The 'who' you are talking to would already know what you're talking about so you wouldn't have to explain to them.
2006-09-19 10:43:29 · answer #7 · answered by icetender 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't suppose you brought a 2007 sports almanac with you, so I can make some bets?
2006-09-19 10:32:26 · answer #8 · answered by shoby_shoby2003 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Get a life!
2006-09-19 11:13:21 · answer #9 · answered by Greatwhitefett 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bit strange really aren't ya?
2006-09-19 10:39:33 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋