English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-19 03:27:23 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

3 answers

Pretty stupid. Registration of firearms has historically led to confiscation of lawfully owned firearms all over the world, and it is exactly what Democrat Senators Ted Kennedy, Charles Schumer, and Dianne Feinstien are trying to do in America.

Britain, Canada, and Australia have experienced increased violent crime rates ever since the consfiscation of legally owned firearms began in each country. Their criminals didn't turn any in.

2006-09-19 03:42:01 · answer #1 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 2 0

Other than hunting canada don't need guns not even for the army they have lived under the protection of the US sense 1776 so has mexico that is what I think

2006-09-19 03:36:42 · answer #2 · answered by Cherokee indian 4 · 1 1

"If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns."

As with many cliches, it does have a significant amount of truth in it.

2006-09-19 03:30:57 · answer #3 · answered by salaamrashaad 2 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers