Political
2006-09-19 03:22:39 · 7 answers · asked by anne c 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Energy from fission or fusion.
Solar energy
2006-09-19 03:25:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Energy created by releasing the energy in matter. There is always a radioactive by-product. This is potentially dangerous material. That's why some people are against this method of producing energy. However, it does take the burden off using the limited resource of fossil fuels - which has to also be taken into consideration. There are also "green" alternatives like wind and solar power - although it may be impractical to obtain so much power in a concentrated area via these means
2006-09-19 10:30:17 · answer #2 · answered by big pup in a small bath 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
From the political point of view, nuclear energy allows to build the ultimate weapons. The physicists concern in Project Manhattan was "Is it big enough?" [to end all wars].
Rational political leaders will not use it, because retaliation would follow, but fringe terrorist groups may consider it.
2006-09-19 10:32:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
By nuclear energy I'm assuming you mean usable for humans. It's derived from nuclear fission which produces heat, which heats water producing steam to drive turbines generating electricity.
2006-09-19 10:27:01 · answer #4 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
nuclear enrgy means getting enrgy from splitting of atom for peacefull purpose .this definion if for iran while for usa is creating a nuclear bomb.
2006-09-19 10:30:46 · answer #5 · answered by nawab allam 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the use of fissionable material to generate heat harnessed to generation of electricity.
2006-09-19 10:25:42 · answer #6 · answered by joseph m 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
energy from radiation
2006-09-19 10:24:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋