No. Most of us are too busy working to spend idle time coming up with conspiracy theories.
2006-09-18 23:23:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
American <--- So, I don't think we'll ever know the whole truth behind 9/11. We'll never know the dirty details : Who dropped the ball, who knew what, who knew and decided not to tell anyone, or more importantly, the correct someones.
I do think that spending tons of money trying to lay blame is a waste of funds and time.
I do think that President Bush isn't smart enough to tell a lie, much less keep one. He's a puppet, his cabinet and advisors are the ones that need watching over.
2006-09-18 23:20:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Physics4Rich 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The last polls I read said that 48% suspect the government of being complicit in 9/11
75% of policemen and firemen in New York believe that it was an inside job.
52% of the deceaseds' relatives believe that it was an inside job
2006-09-19 01:09:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anyone that believes that the American Government was behind 911 didn't listen to Osama Bin Ladin. He says he did it. Why would he lie about it? What would he have to gain? A Bunker Buster up the butt?
2006-09-19 00:05:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by mark g 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, Bush is involved. He is trying to blame Clinton for not killing BinLaden when he had the chance but I beleive the attack never would have occured in the first place had Bush not been president.
2006-09-19 01:39:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by ChaliQ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
At this point and faced with the documented evidence
OF:
THERMATE
BOMBS GOING OFF EVERYWHERE
FREEFALL INTO FOOTPRINT
DETONATION SQUIBS
SMOLDERING POOLS OF MOLTEN STEEL FOR WEEKS
KRONGARD INSIDER TRADING ('PUTS' ON UNITED AND AMERICAN)
BLATENT BLDG 7 DEMO-IMPLOSION
SILVERSTEIN'S "PULL IT"
PEOPLE WARNED NOT TO FLY
PROVEN FAKE OBL TAPES
7 OF 19 ALIVE
NO ARABS ON ANY FLIGHT MANIFESTS
NORAD STAND DOWN ORDER
CNN REPORT OF "NO PLANE AT PENTAGON"
RUMSFELD ADMITTING A MISSILE HIT THE PENTAGON
RUMSFELD ADMITTING FLT 93 WAS SHOT DOWN
MULTIPLE SIMULTANEOUS WARGAMES ON 9-11 OF THE EXACT SCENERIO
FEMA'S ARRIVAL TO LOWER MANHATTAN ON SEPT.10TH
PNAC'S PUBLISHED NEED FOR A "NEW PEARL HARBOR"
SS NOT REACTING TO GOAT READING CHIMP TARGET
OPERATION NORTHWOODS
THE DOWNING STREET MEMO
BUSH'S DIARY ENTRY 'NEW PEARL HARBOR'
ANYONE STILL CLINGING TO THE BUSHCO ISSUED FAIRYTALE IS EITHER A DOWN SYNDROME VICTIM OR SOMEONE WHO WOULD FOLLOW BUSH'S LIES TO THEIR GRAVE.
THERE'S NO MORE DEBATING
THAT'S THE END OF THIS STORY
2006-09-19 02:21:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by mikeygonebad 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I really don't care what the world thinks lol. It's none of their business. I could explain it to you but am tired of doing so. No conspiracy. Just a bunch of mad terrorists on a mission to kill us that's all.
2006-09-18 23:29:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by crusinthru 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just because the Bush administration was enept, incompetant and criminal in its negligance does not mean they planned the whole thing...but I do think once they realized it was going to happen, they realized the strategic political value in allowing it to take place. This was the chimp's trifecta.
2006-09-18 23:13:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Here's what's REALLY going on with 9/11!...
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/911/Robert.htm
2006-09-19 00:42:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
interior the aftermath of the 9/11 assaults and usa's next invasion of Afghanistan, the Bush administration grew to alter into lots greater focused on scuffling with worldwide terrorism. Their often happening objectives weren't the terrorists themselves, however the governments who supported them. Of optimum priority to Bush grew to become into Iraq, which had long been accused of having a covert weapons of mass destruction application and doubtless even deliberate to . The rhetoric that got here from his administration grew to become into that the Iraqi government under Saddam Hussein could be keen to dispense its arsenal to anti-American terrorist agencies, going so a processes as alleging ties between Iraq and al-Qaeda. not one of the evidence supplied via intelligence companies implicated Hussein in any of this, and the Bush administration went out of its thank you to discredit any evidence to the choice. i think of George W. Bush's intentions have been constructive. He observed Saddam Hussein as an extremely ruthless tyrant who should not be allowed to rule a rustic - and rightly so. Saddam Hussein greater a pervasive cult of character around himself, finished and tortured a limitless style of harmless human beings on the mere suspicion of dissidence, committed genocide against the Kurdish human beings interior the north via utilising chemical gasoline, brutally repressed the Iraqi Shi'ite community, invaded 3 neighbouring countries devoid of provocation (Iran, Kuwait, and quickly Saudi Arabia), released missile assaults against Israel for no different reason than to learn interior of sight help, and subsidized terrorist agencies against his political opponents. 1000's of 1000's (if not tens of millions) died on the palms of the Hussein regime in Iraq. yet Bush's justification for invading the rustic grew to become into defective and the conflict as an entire grew to become into unwell-conceived. they did not think with regard to the Sunni-Shia conflict that would desire to exceedingly much unquestionably engulf Iraq afterwards, and defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld did not make any attempt to plot out the post-invasion area of the conflict. the end result grew to become right into a bloody sectarian conflict that keeps to this present day.
2016-12-15 10:21:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋