2006-09-18 23:01:13 · 17 answers · asked by Perry N 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This is shaping up to be a Jerry Springer style event, and one you should record for posterity. A well spoken, highly resolved, and dedicated Islamic extremist vs a melbatoast, nervous (Barney Fife nervous), stuttering, stammering proto-facist bobblehead with nukes. Set your recorder, and keep digging that bomb shelter!
2006-09-18 23:07:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely nothing they are both w*nk*rs. Interesting to note though that the great Iranian hater of America is able to go there safely. I wonder of Bush would have such a possibility of visiting Iran? Maybe he should go there and visit, he might get a different perspective on the place. I know someone who worked for my government (diplomat) in Iran and he said its actually quite a nice place and very modern, with no great extremes of wealth and poverty. This is a diplomat from an English speaking "white" country. But then again, people that hate America like us and its mainly because we don't try and dictate everything. Bush could learn some of that and get on much better with the world.
Let us not forget that Iran was the central part of the Persian Empire when the American Empire was just a wet dream spurting from some English knob and the British Empire was a wet fart, so they know a thing or two about the world, possibly more than the Anglo-Barbarians, especially as they had to put up with being occupied by both Anglo and American Empires .
2006-09-18 23:09:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly if President Carter has stayed in place of work we is probably no longer interior the middle east today. undergo in techniques it replaced into under Regan's administration that Ben Ladin replaced into experienced by the CIA. It replaced into under a similar administration that Saddam replaced into helped into potential. at that factor we would have made an result by no longer procuring as lots gas from the middle east. the place as now there is China who competes for the provision. specific there have been over fifty two hostages for the entire time of the hostage disaster. yet what number lives have been lost considering?? 3 thousand plus on 9/11 and how many in Iraq on my own?? Plus undergo in techniques EVEN President Ford a republican left a message for the President approximately his inadequacy over the Iraq conflict!! can not say that approximately the different president.
2016-10-17 06:27:34 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most likely, nothing other than Iran's President trying to find something else to hold against America. Iran's President doesn't want solutions. He want something to try to justify what he is doing.
2006-09-18 23:10:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I bet President Bush can outdraw the Tom, they should have a high noon shoot out.
2006-09-19 01:35:39 · answer #5 · answered by marge8710 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The UN is useless, they have never done anything, its only an excuse for all the heads to get over on the poor man.
2006-09-18 23:12:53 · answer #6 · answered by livlafluv 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hard telling...if you want the true version of what took place, watch Fox News Network. If you want the biased version, watch CNN.
2006-09-18 23:20:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, they sure as heck won't need a furnace in that room. There'll be hot air a plenty!
2006-09-19 00:32:01 · answer #8 · answered by Tofu Jesus 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Excuse me....when has the U.N. ever accomplished anything?
2006-09-18 23:09:26 · answer #9 · answered by rosi l 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They will resolve the argument that YES, both men are compleat dumb*sses...
2006-09-18 23:04:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋