English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-18 22:21:16 · 20 answers · asked by pillai 1 in Sports Cricket

20 answers

No according to you point they are not unlucky.
They are unlucky because they had a deceptive coach who is on a mission to ruin the Indian team's base and they are unlucky because instead of the royal Bengal tiger they are lead by (Rahul) dumb as a captain. Even if it would not have rained then also they were going to lose the match because of these two paid deceptive and dumb
But people are so blind that they can't see the fact that these two dumbs are worse than a termite who is decaying our base.

2006-09-19 06:32:57 · answer #1 · answered by .. 6 · 3 0

Yes and No!!

India in not unlucky in this series 'cause -
They are in race to final due to rain and bad/ overconfident show batting by WIs.

India is Unlucky -
'cause there are few people are on mission to destroy the whole team. The Captain, BCCI is still sleeping or behaving merely as spectators waiting for wonders to happen. It Can't be worse.

2006-09-21 23:53:12 · answer #2 · answered by sms_ons 1 · 0 0

Ignore Shravya's answer. She's after points.

Now, to answer your question, yes! Indians are damn unlucky in the ongoing Malaysia Cricket series. RAIN RAIN GO AWAY! US INDIANS WANT TO PLAY!

2006-09-19 05:29:59 · answer #3 · answered by King of Hearts 6 · 0 0

Yes, I'm agree with you. In first match against W.I. i think Indian bowler could bowl well after 20 overs I've a reason about it, you had seen it against Australia. Indian bowler came back strongly after power play (20 over) and W.I. have their last two main batsman at the crease if any wicket fall after that the W.I. run rate automatically came down. Against Australia it shows that after Chandrapul, Lara, Gayle, Sharwan the wicket of W.I. collapse. So, India's chance after 20 over is more than W.I.

And in second match Indian opener chasing the total slowly and saving their wickets but after rain all the things are changed Indian team have to chase a run rate of 6.50. So they came in pressure collapsed.

2006-09-19 05:56:03 · answer #4 · answered by Bluffmaster 4 · 0 0

r u sure? do u think india would hav gone 2 win the e match against australia when they were 5 down n rain started??? yes they r unlucky coz they dont have best captain ganguly,,they dun have balaji n zaheer who r bettter than many others in the team...

2006-09-19 05:52:31 · answer #5 · answered by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4 · 1 0

In all games the result is definitely upon the effect given by the players not through luck.

2006-09-19 11:42:11 · answer #6 · answered by Hawkiteagle 2 · 0 0

i think india could not win the DLF cup, also India would not be able to win either the Champions trophy or the world cup...........

India lacks something..........but i m not sure what! No good pace bowlers, and overall the moral support like the aussies doesn't exist in the indian team..........dunno why?

2006-09-19 08:35:13 · answer #7 · answered by fars_aswad 5 · 0 0

Yes

2006-09-19 06:02:16 · answer #8 · answered by aru_dipu 1 · 0 0

yeah surely

Bco'z we could have easily won the match against west indies and even australia did not post any huge total against the indian batting line up and so we could have easily wrapped up those two matches which could have taken us to the finals without much difficulty.

2006-09-21 11:09:11 · answer #9 · answered by Manoj A 2 · 0 0

hi,
i think whatever u r asking in this question doesn't seems 2 be true 2 me. maybe 'cause u don't get any answers that's y... well sorry 2 say that but its true. if u want any good info related 2 studies or whatever u like u can ask through this site.

2006-09-19 05:27:54 · answer #10 · answered by shravya r 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers