Not true! May be obvious for some, but not for others.
2006-09-18 20:47:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's the purloined letter syndrome. What should in fact be obvious becomes nearly invisible by familiarity. The "hide in plain sight" phenomenon. People walk through familiar spaces only noting changes, not the things which have been the same for some time. It's a natural allotment of attention, very rational.
But it means that when something unusual happens in a familiar setting, it sometimes takes longer to register than one would think wise. Quick response time can be critical at times, you know. It's one of those things people have to train themselves to do efficiently, but it works.
Problem is, there is really no substitute for being conscious of all around you and efficiently processing your necessary response to it at all times. It's called being awake and alert, and adults just have to do that thing, you know?
2006-09-18 20:54:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by auntb93again 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the obvious is usually the truth & the truth hurts. Those who are aware & are in power will subjugate the obvious/truth & spin their own "truths" for their own ends.
2006-09-19 02:12:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kevin F 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
people generally do not look for the obvious.
2006-09-18 20:47:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. often times i'm "oblivious", to the obtrusive...... :o( LOL! EDIT: "SEE I advised you, i presumed it mentioned obtrusive to the obtrusive..." LOL! that's obvious i could desire to circulate to mattress....
2016-10-15 04:00:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Isn't it obvious?
2006-09-21 22:41:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by kosum 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
the only reason is because it is obvious that's why it's always obvious.you can not renew the reason because it will be obvious...
2006-09-18 20:56:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by archiemedes 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
cause that is way too much common sense for some of us logic deficient individuals who use uncommon sense
2006-09-18 20:53:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
qua quo qua quo qua quo qua quo qua. trust me i am a philosafer
2006-09-19 08:48:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Occy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Beacuase if it wasn't it would be a mystery
2006-09-18 20:54:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Pendergast 2
·
0⤊
0⤋