If we were looking at another country doing what our president has done, he'd be up on charges. We'd condemn that country and tell the world that something needs to be done. However, the difference would be the other countries would use diplomacy, not bullets to do their talking.
2006-09-18 18:37:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by rgbear38 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Before Bush can be impeach, there must be a change in Congress in the November elections, that is if the Diebold Machines (about 10% of the total vote) don't change the results.
Second, there must be supoenas from Congress to investigate any improprieties by Bush & Cheney. From the investigations then articles of impeachment can go forward.
I am with you, I signed that a long time ago.
Then Bush & Cheney must be impeached together because they are not above the Law.
2006-09-18 19:05:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by smiley0_1_1999 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Another silly political rant with no basis.
Hey, I'm a Demo and didn't vote for the Prez. But, he is right about the terrorists.
Ignore everything that the present administration says about the war on terror. Just read and watch what Al Qaeda releases. The latest thriller from Al Qaeda shows Bin Laden blessing those who were responsible for the terrorist attacks on 9/11. Two of the hijackers openly boast about their planned jihad in NYC. These crazies rail about Western violence against Muslims in Chechyna and Bosnia on Al Qaeda's tape.
Of course, it was the American Air Force that bombed the Christians to defend the Muslims in Bosnia...oh well, why deal with the facts when you need to feed your own victimhood.
Think!
2006-09-18 18:40:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by grognd 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Get together, take senate and congress back in November. Then let him suffer by making him a Lame Duck for two years is better than impeaching him. Nothing is more painful than not being able to do what he wants for an arrogant and illiterate man.
2006-09-18 18:34:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by WISEMAN 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Impeach him for what? If this is the sole agenda of the Democrats, I hope no one votes for them in the next election. That would be abating the enemy - it is exactly what they would want. Instead of getting to business and taking care of not only our own country and domestic issues, but the Iraq war and Afganistan war, and the future bomb in Iran. Our country would be so busy with this nonsense that it would take time, and TAXPAYER resources for nothing.
2006-09-18 19:28:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by School Is Great 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm down with you! I want to see Bush impeached as much as you do. Now it's about time for this two-time election thief to face the voters for various acts of wrongdoing such as needlessly allowing deaths in the wake of Hurricane Katrina in the Gulf Coast last year, abusing his constitutionally-granted powers for his personal and political gain, and a host of other impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors. The same goes for the highest-ranking members of the Bush administration. You are right, nobody is above the law! NOBODY!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-09-18 18:39:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by brian 2010 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Impeachment is proper if there is a valid reason under the Constitution.
2006-09-18 18:39:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
but who will impeach the President, i am waiting for the next election this November.
2006-09-18 18:59:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Smiling face 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Isn't that kind of rhetoric...hmmm... polarizing?
The thing that bugs me is that nobody can have a decent conversation about anything without being open to any kind of debate. Nothing's that simple.
2006-09-18 18:33:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by clover spots 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I hope it works I really do but this man is really above the law and no one can touch the little hitler your fighting a losing battle
2006-09-18 18:33:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by ROSEY 3
·
3⤊
2⤋