If the south had won the civil war, how long would slavery have lasted in the CSA?

Question

It obviously would have ended at some point, but how long would it have taken? Assuming you believe it would have.

Answer 1

It depends perhaps on WHEN the South is presumed to have won the war.

In the final months, Davis and Lee were willing to free slaves so they could join the ranks of fighting men, so the answer might be 1865.

Slavery was finally abolished in Brazil in 1888. Considering industrialization would probably have come to the CSA sooner, and that pressure from the abolotionist cotton-buying Brits might have had an effect, one could guess it would have certainly disappeared from the CSA by then.

Answer 2

There could guard to be 2 separate international locations. The CSA could have ended slavery themselves interior 10-15 years. The races could have a miles larger foundation for peace between as numerous the motives for racism interior the South at contemporary is a great away very final effect of Reconstruction and subjugation with the aid of means of the U. S.. the u . s . could have a weaker state and interior reach government with an lots greater overbearing Federal government than is at contemporary good right here. The CSA could guard to have a reliable State and interior reach government with a small streamlined stable arranged Centralised government. guy or woman rights may well be in place interior the CSA in spite of if now no longer interior the u . s .. Democrats may well be the conservatives and distinctive activities could flesh out the entertainment interior the CSA. interior the u . s . the liberals could guard to be the Republicans. The Democrats could guard to be the conservatives interior the u . s . as stable. numerous of the northern Mexican providences could have entered the CSA giving them get admission to to each oceans. the u . s . could have persevered to strengthen west as stable giving her get admission to to each oceans. The CSA may well be stronger economically than the u . s .. the two could grow to be superpowers in my opinion and for one among a variety motives. the u . s . could have entered each wars as she did. The CSA could have sent help in spite of if could now no longer have invaded one greater united states of america.

Answer 3

you are not looking at the war from the correct point. the civil war WAS NOT about owning slaves. it was about a way of life. the united states and president Lincoln did not Free the slaves he only freed the slaves in the areas of the south that the northern army was in control of at that time. if you check your history and im sure that you will have do do some work, president grant owned slaves until he ran for president at which point he freed his slaves. im not a racist or a hater just a history fan. i think you need more than what they teach in school. because the teach about the civil war from the northern side and not from the middle with an open view of both sides

Answer 4

thats really hard to say; but i would guess not long - it's really almost impossible to imagine though: the north had all the railroads, infrastructure and economic clout; the southern economy was stagnant save for the value of the land and the natural increase in the slaves themselves. also, the expansion of cotton crops internationally was silmutaneously undercutting the South's worldwide market dominance - one reason British textiles survived the american civil war just fine w/o southern cotton.

the point is not so much long would slavery have lasted; its long would the confederacy have.

Answer 5

Probably not that long. It was already getting very expensive--why pay for, house, and feed a slave when you could hire an Irishman for pennies a day? And technology was already coming along which would make harvesting and planting crops easier. Most Southerners couldn't afford more than one or two slaves, at most, and they worked in the field alongside them. It would have saved them a lot of money to just hire day labor as needed, or get machinery.

Answer 6

Probably not a whole lot longer than it did. The South didn't have a whole lot keeping it propped up anyways - war was actually inevitable in order to *save* the South, I think.

Answer 7

Not much longer. Whitney invented the cotton gin. McCormick invented the reaper. Other farm equipment was in the works, such as steam powered tractors and threshing machines. Slavery would have died out soon.
Unfortunately slavery was revived, but they called it share-cropping.

Answer 8

It's impossible for them to win. It's all about the numbers and the Union had it. They also had the resources. Slavery is evil.

Answer 9

there still is slavery all over the world, just not legal in most places

Answer 10

WHERE is the CSA? If you mean the USA; I haven't the foggiest.