I all seriousness, she's been having a good life and is reported to be the richest woman in America. Have her & California's Arnold S. battle it out for the top spot. She'd lose. She likes making money. She's got her reward.
2006-09-18 16:10:16 · 15 answers · asked by ZORRO 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
My experience is that women are not leaders...they are wondeful neogtiatiors, talkers, interviewers...and very empathic to other people. But these are difficult times that need a leader a commander...some testosterone...and no offense to the ladies, not their role in our society...they are the communicators...they let remind us of our heart who do all those things...but not able to make a decision without group consent and group input...that is not a leader. Look at Hilary Clinton, she does everything by commitee, sweet for a cable TV show, but not when we need tough decisions.
2006-09-18 16:16:44 · answer #1 · answered by BigScotter 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You would want another rich person to be president? It seems we've had enough of them. President Truman was the last of the gentlemen presidents. He never owned a home and he was a blue collar worker. What we need is some middle, working class representation, whether it is a man or woman. There has to be a way to get people elected without the millions of dollars in donations.
2006-09-18 16:37:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, we do not need Oprah to run for President. Although I dont like bush, we are not that desperate. She knows a lot of things, but not that much about politics. She doesnt have the eduation, although she has the money. However, I dont oppose a woman running our country. but, it must be someone smart and with experience such as Hiliary Clinton. Generally, gender doesnt matter that much, just ability.
2006-09-18 16:14:28 · answer #3 · answered by mulan2890 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No we just need a democrat. Besides we all know if Oprah beat Arnold. The terminator would come back next election year and clear house.
2006-09-18 16:14:19 · answer #4 · answered by Thin King 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
"Can somebody please record 5 actual accomplishments..." He has grow to be greater effective at mendacity. Harvard has taught him the thank you to play the mass for fools. He could desire to have extremely enjoyed Machiavelli's e book, "The Prince". He performs the race card extremely properly! He has discovered the thank you to make his cult followers think of that he has on no account achieved one among those element. as a rule because of the fact they are racist to boot. for this reason, they have not got a subject with it. And final. He has achieved a marvelous pastime of hiding who has given him what money and what their reason is for doing so. And for an extra bonus: he's doing an incredible pastime of growing to be constructive human beings do no longer study in this united states of america approximately who his cousin, Raila Odinga, extremely is.
2016-10-15 03:52:27 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually she has a lot of influence already and I don't think becoming president would increase her positive influence, she probably can influence more people in being on tv for one hour every day!!!!
2006-09-18 19:03:47 · answer #6 · answered by inzaratha 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you gave a good answer, but she is too smart to assume the Iraq mess, world disapproval, and national debt. In fact who in their right mind would take the job???
2006-09-18 16:34:14 · answer #7 · answered by longroad 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I love original ideas that are a total waste of energy!
2006-09-18 16:17:35 · answer #8 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
And I thought Hilary was too liberal. Maybe she would spend her money not the taxpayers.
2006-09-18 16:19:25 · answer #9 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think Jerry Springer would be a better candidate
2006-09-18 16:12:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋