Should President Bush be impeached for lying to U.S. Citizens?

Question

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=The_case_for_impeachment_of_President_George_W._Bush

Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the rule of law; carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting in the death and maiming of tens of thousands of Iraqis, and hundreds of U.S. G.I.s.
Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.
Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable.
Threatening the independence and sovereignty of Iraq by belligerently changing its government by force and assaulting Iraq in a war of aggression..

The list goes on - click the link to read more and decide for yourself...

Answer 1

THE ANSWER IS A RESOUNDING YES.

Bush should be tried for TREASON actually - far more serious than Clinton's bobos from Lewinsky.

In a just society, Bush would be publicly executed.

Answer 2

There are 500 members of congress who voted to go to war. Two bipartisan committees recommended going to war. Bush could not have convinced most of congress by asking them to "trust him." We've all read the Hillary and Kerry quotes saying that they strongly supported us going to war.

Bush is not Yoda, he didn't use a Jedi mind trick to lead a country and both houses of congress in a bipartisan call to war. Everyone believed the evidence presented to them. They relied on Bill Clinton saying he was sure WMD's existed and explaining why Saddam was such a huge threat.

Plus he need to have committed criminal acts to face impeachment. He can claim those decisions were not lies, but were the best decisions he could make with the information available to him. As president he has to know so much he must rely on briefings and assessments from people who may be influenced by prejudices, because they are humans. No President can know every detail about everything he is expected to know about.

There are other charges he can face impeachment over, but lying is not one of them.

Answer 3

properly--you strengthen a sturdy factor. although, there is yet differently of watching this (and, BTW, i do no longer prefer impeachment, despite if i think of Bush and Cheney the two deserve it). First--lots of folk are venting--and in case you will spend time on Y/A politics or any comparable communicate board, extra constructive get used to it! :) extra to the factor--do no longer assume it may harm the Democrats politically. Polls teach 40 5% of the yank human beings do prefer impeaching Bush--the parent for Cheney is even bigger. 2 issues could could desire to happen, although. First, there could could desire to be some quite clean-decrease journey-say, a right away hyperlink between warrentless spying on individuals that traced directly to Bush. it is quite achieveable. yet you may additionally could desire to have a extra or much less finished collabse of the republican coalition interior the Senate--and mutually as that coalition is going to furnish way quicker or later on the Iraq difficulty, i do no longer see it growing to be to be so huge that a 2/3 vote could desire to be carried out--and it may be pointless to question without a raffle of conviction. you besides mght reported that "the Democrats have supported each and every thing Bush has executed at one time or yet another." Sorry--it is purely erroneous--and that they have in no way supported the knds of strikes Bush has taken that factor to achieveable impeacheable offenses--e.g. using warrentless/no-court docket reviewed surveillance).

Answer 4

You are obviously an uninformed Democrat, who take the party line without really thinking it through. If George is a liar, then most of the congress is too, because they voted to allow the war. Now, the Democrats feel that even though they concurred with the President, they now feel that if they call people liars long enough - is six years long enough?, their Democratic nonthinking colleagues will swear that it is true. It would be nice if the present congress could pass something 100 to nothing (except a pay raise raise) and actually work together to solve the countries problems. I get sick and tired about the do nothing congress, who can only get up at the lecturn and spout the party line. It looks to me as if a housekeeping job is needed, to find positive people who will work together to get thejob done. If its in the least bit controversial, they send to committee to kill it. Social Security, protecting the borders, and the list goes on and on. Shame on you congress. But worse than that, shame on us for electing them.

Answer 5

Not only would every president the US has ever had be impeached, but if lying were illegal you would be in jail tonight.
Where do you kids get this stuff? Presidents always bend truth to run government & that includes wars. Do you want a road map sent to Al Queda, Iran, North Korea & every country that would like to destroy the United States? Grow up & think!

Answer 6

His lies have gotten over 3,000 U.S. citizens killed in Iraq. Yes he should be impeached for that. There is a difference between lying and merely making errors in judgment. He had his mind made up to invade Iraq even before he took office.

Answer 7

At the time, the intelligence was presented to Bush and Congress and everyone believed it was true.
If you're going to impeach Bush, you will also need to go after every single member of Congress who looked at the same data.
If it was wrong, you think Bush should have magically known, but members of Congress shouldn't have the same standard?

I'm really sorry that you were dropped on your head as a child...

Answer 8

I think you'd have to prove that he lied - I mean that he literally spoke with the intent to deceive. And that's not gonna be easy. He has Karl Rove on his team, remember?

Answer 9

That and hypocrisy. We invade Iraq to grab oil fields, after fighting in the last Persian Gulf War to stop Iraq from capturing the oil fields of Kuwait.

Answer 10

No, let it go, he is out of office in January 2009 and that is the end of it. If we have not learned to pick better by November 2008 then we deserve whatever we get.