English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Let Citizens Vote: "The Senate is planning to quietly hold a vote that would pardon President Bush for breaking the law by illegally wiretapping innocent Americans without warrants. According to Senator Leahy, the bill would "...immunize officials who have violated federal law by authorizing such illegal activities.

The program was exposed in December of last year, we've learned that President Bush personally blocked a Justice Department investigation of the program, Vice President Cheney also personally intervened to stop telecom companies from testifying to Congress about it, and a federal court recently ruled the program unconstitutional.9 In an effort to protect himself from further consequences."

President Bush broke the law, and courts are starting to agree. Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter once said the program was illegal "on its face." But he has now caved to pressure from Vice President Cheney."

2006-09-18 15:42:23 · 13 answers · asked by Reba K 6 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

Eastern District Court said that the NSA wiretapping program, aimed at communications by potential terrorists, violates privacy and free speech rights and the constitutional separation of powers among the three branches of government; That the wiretaps violate the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the 1978 law instituted to provide judicial oversight of clandestine surveillance within the United States.

"It was never the intent of the framers to give the president such unfettered control, particularly where his actions blatantly disregard the parameters clearly enumerated in the Bill of Rights," the judge said.

2006-09-18 15:50:51 · update #1

13 answers

Since this was approved by Congress, what law was broken?

2006-09-18 17:14:32 · answer #1 · answered by 75160 4 · 0 0

I would more personally like to know when the United States Government began the insane policy of letting everyone, including the left wing radicals of the news media, know everything that they do? Or for that matter, why should they? Had this kind of moronic attitude where "the public has a right to know" been the norm during the 1940's the Axis powers would have won the war. I don't need to know everything the government does, who orders it, or why. I have voted for the people I trusted to take care of me and my family and accept what they do as part of it. If that means the CIA and the NSA have a few thousand wire taps going on listening for the words, Allah, jihad, bomb, or Bush, then so be it.

2006-09-18 16:09:07 · answer #2 · answered by greyfalcon2112 2 · 0 0

Congress approved the wiretaps and has done so for at least the last three Presidents. Under Clinton, it extended to project Carnivore to snoop emails on the fly.

Bush does not need to be 'pardoned' for doing what he was permitted to do by Congress - HIS JOB.

The only question remaining is whether the naysayers can, like Bush, take the 9/11 Commission recommendations seriously and start really fighting the enemy among us.

2006-09-18 15:47:19 · answer #3 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 1 1

Reality is that the phone calls being tapped into are not the phone calls between most citizens. They are tracking calls to certain countries with known terrorist cells. It has obviously stopped attacks noting the UK plane plot just a few weeks ago. I personally am willing to give up my freedom and have my calls tapped because I have nothing to hide.

2006-09-18 15:52:10 · answer #4 · answered by Rexy 3 · 0 0

Seems to me he would have to be charged with a crime in order to receive a pardon. You know like that tax cheat Clinton pardoned right before he left office. Bush hasn't broken any laws. Geez this crap gets old!

2006-09-18 16:06:55 · answer #5 · answered by Cinner 7 · 0 0

He should be held responsible for his part in ordering the illegal wiretaps and violating the Constitution. He is not above the law and should have to have a reprimand as well as being impeached. That will not remove him from office but will neutralise him from doing stuff like this again

2006-09-18 15:45:49 · answer #6 · answered by jerofjungle 5 · 3 2

of course you recommend "getting away" with the wiretapping of each and every telephone call and each internet communication without even an genuine analyze into the bush administration, expenditures, censure or impeachment complaints no longer "pardoned" from crimes they could desire to have been charged with and convicted for yet have not. i think of there could desire to be impeachment hearings, simply by fact before everything he's purely broken too many rules, the wiretapping purely one case of dozens. And secondly he won't face fact relating to the authentic undertaking in Iraq immediately meaning we will lose if he continues to be in fee simply by fact his techniques won't artwork interior the genuine international. simply by fact he isn't basing them and could no longer base them on what's actual occurring there, it ability we will not win with him in fee, and he won't admit it, meaning the only selection left we've is to eliminate him from place of work to win the conflict. An honorable guy could be truthful adequate with himself to the two start up looking out what the fact is approximately what's occurring and justly do what it takes to win or if he can not and issues are spiriling uncontrolled, despite if slowly(which i believe they are), he could desire to renounce. and finally under his management we've not been scuffling with the conflict legally, ethically and morally as we could desire to continuously be and could desire to be, that's what makes us the sturdy adult males, and we are no longer residing as much as that, it is why we've lots hate geared in direction of us, and if we did combat like that we'd have extra fulfillment and make extra allies extremely of enemies.

2016-10-17 06:07:29 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If he broke the law impeach or arrest him, innocent until proven guilty, hasnt been proven guilty in a court of law yet, and with appeals, he'll make it through his term untouched anyway....do something creative with your life and stop worrying about things you cant change because not enough people care enough about things they dont see, out of sight out of mind....

2006-09-18 15:47:43 · answer #8 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 1 0

I think we should hold him for treason and give them to the families who died in 911. Let them take them an undisclosed location not under the geniva act.

2006-09-18 15:48:57 · answer #9 · answered by circusdejojo 3 · 0 0

No pardon.

I am beginning to see Bush as a dictator. If we keep allowing this to happen, then we will be living in a dictatorship.

Damn Bush!

2006-09-18 15:46:44 · answer #10 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers