E. Kennison or Curry. Does it not matter bc they both suck equally>?
2006-09-18 15:40:43 · 7 answers · asked by nittanyisland2000 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Of those two, keep Kennison. KC's WRs may suck, but he's still the #1 WR on his team.
As for Curry, the raiders have been incredibly sucky, their QB just got hurt, and for all we know, Porter may break into the starting lineup at any time. He's really not worth a roster spot at this time.
2006-09-18 15:51:40 · answer #1 · answered by Bramblyspam 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eddie Curry. Kennison is the lead receiver.
2006-09-19 03:20:52 · answer #2 · answered by kylebakesb 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Drop Curry. As bad as the raiders suck you don't need any of their receivers. Kennison ain't much but I guess he's better than nothin'.
2006-09-18 22:53:06 · answer #3 · answered by stan l 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know who Curry is so I would keep E. Kennison.
2006-09-18 22:42:45 · answer #4 · answered by Mister Farlay 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Drop Curry.
2006-09-18 22:48:06 · answer #5 · answered by Jonathan R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
kennison is still "#1" rec option on his team at least, so i would keep him as backup
2006-09-18 22:43:21 · answer #6 · answered by kla 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
flip a coin cuz neither has a QB
2006-09-18 22:54:33 · answer #7 · answered by the greg 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋