"Under an agreement with the French company Lacoste, a line of clothing known as "Izod Lacoste" was produced for the U.S. market until the 1990s. Lacoste withdrew Izod's license to produce Lacoste-branded clothing over not-unfounded quality concerns. The loss of this license greatly attributed to Izod's falling popularity."
I wore Izod back during the "Preppy" days and had no problem with quality.
2006-09-18 14:18:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by J W 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Lacoste used to be known as Izod.
But I'm guessing Lacoste formed it's own little line, whatever.
They're not the same, at least not now.
I didn't even know Izod had an alligator.
Lacoste is better, still.
2006-09-18 14:16:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
if you mean are they a part of the same major organization then yes. i believe they are manufactured by the same company but divided based on designers. Lacoste was started by some tennis player a long time ago, but izod is some guy's modern take on it
2006-09-18 14:16:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Lacoste is more expensive.They pretty much both offer the same style preppy look polo shirts.
2006-09-18 20:56:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by pinkkidsclubbing 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no lacoste is way preppier and more expensive..i like it better I have one of their shirts in hot pink it's fabulous
2006-09-18 14:12:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by mrs michelle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
nah. lacoste is betterrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
2006-09-18 14:11:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.lacoste is the better of the2..
2006-09-18 14:14:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by hackworth c 2
·
0⤊
0⤋