English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

perhaps it could even go on the empty plynth in Trafalgar Square?

2006-09-18 11:50:40 · 38 answers · asked by Anglian 1 in Politics & Government Government

38 answers

Yes. She would not have let this country go the way Blair has. Dave the boy will never be able to perform like she did. His creepy ferret like attitude to her makes any real Tory sick. She may have made mistakes but compared to this lot she was brilliant.

2006-09-19 10:29:26 · answer #1 · answered by deadly 4 · 1 1

What is so great about Thatcher that made you ask this question? I'm puzzled.

Thatcher should be forgotten.

There should be a statue of a coal miner in Trafalgar Square with the words "destroyed by Thatcher but not forgotten".

2006-09-18 12:15:34 · answer #2 · answered by citizen 2 · 4 1

the woman was a monster. she destroyed our industry, and introduced teh poll tax..she even took the free school milk off kids in 1967...

what did she create, whats maggies legacy? poverty and despair, our children cant be controlled,they have no jobs to go to, we re dependent on imports of foreign coal..maggie create both rich and poor people, and the poor outnumbered the rich 5000 to 0ne

you put her in trafalgar square, and ill train pigeons to dump on her all day long... trafalgar square is for heroes, not old greys from grantham who sold this great country down the road.

yes i know weve had a labour government for quite a few years, and they appear to be a poor job, but we live in difficult times, and they inherited 18 years of tory squeeze, and even though tax is slwoly crawling upwards, its nowher near the 15% we had to endure under maggie.

2006-09-18 12:13:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Absolutely not! Margaret Thatcher was a horrible, horrible person throughout her premiership and I should imagine still is. She may have made some wise moves in the Falklands War, but she had no respect for the working classes and ruined thousands of families lives when she closed down the mines. People are still suffering in many ex-industrial towns because of her.

2006-09-18 11:55:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

i actual think of she grew to become into mind-blowing, whether I additionally think of with those large leaders they are actually not the puppet masters yet purely the puppets. between the flaws i do no longer and did no longer like on the time grew to become into loss of the unions ability. and that's by way of fact i think of they held decrease back the administration by making use of state. by way of fact of her the small guy now no longer has a voice. And that made it much less confusing to do away with our freedom to illustrate against tyranny. people have been having events to have fun her loss of life!!!!! I purely think of that shows how poor society is transforming into. those people who've been whipped up by making use of the manipulation of social networking web pages like brainless automatons. Margaret Thatcher had sturdy and undesirable. however the fact is that she grew to become right into a great clever and brave female.

2016-10-01 03:07:15 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

only when she's really dead (and not just pretending like she is now), and it should be in Westminster like the other statues, certainly not in trafalgar square, this should be saved a real hero, perhaps an unknown war hero from Iraq.

2006-09-18 11:54:42 · answer #6 · answered by thebigtombs 5 · 2 1

oh yeh. I remember the yts. do you? thanks to her at age 16 we had to do a 40 hour week for £26.50 when you could get £33.00 on the dole.There were no worthwhile qaulifications and you got binned after two years for the next bout of slave labour. She has a lot to answer for todays societys actions and was quite active in the creation of it in my opinion. Yeh erect a statue in honour of the ruination she wrought on a generation of Britains, great idea.I'll be first in line to remove it with my good old british cricket
bat.
oh and ps in year two it went up a whole £6 thanks maggie.

2006-09-18 12:01:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Sure...it can be used as a scarecrow to frighten off excess pigeons.

She had some remarkable triumphs in her early career, but she contributed to a march to totalitarian centralisation of power in the government which overshadows her other accomplishments.

I'm sorry did you say statue or effigy.

2006-09-18 12:06:49 · answer #8 · answered by R.Me 2 · 4 1

I think an statue to her in the UK would be as welcome as one of any Nazi representative in Germany.

It just won't happen.

As for the empty plinth - we should have an array of large plasma screens put on the top of it so the 'thing' on there can change from day to day or hour to hour as no one can decide what they want to see up there and, in this nanny state, no-one wants to suggest anything for fear of upsetting the person standing next to them.

2006-09-18 12:07:59 · answer #9 · answered by Yagowra Shakaboom 2 · 2 0

All the scabs and coppers should contribute from the money they made during 1984/85.

We will be having a party when she departs down below.

2006-09-18 12:07:50 · answer #10 · answered by pitwoman 1 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers