No. The only way a woman belongs in the White House is if she is cleaning it, in the kitchen fixing food, or on her knees under a desk.
2006-09-22 03:21:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr. Garrison 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
It depends entirely on who the Republican candidate is. If she runs against Colin Powell, no. If she runs against Condi Rice, yes.
Hilary Clinton chose not to condemn her husband for his mistake. That was HER choice and that is actually between the Clintons and the stupid intern. It's none of our business since, as the impeachment hearing clearly showed, Bill Clinton did not abuse his office.
I have my own reservations about Hilary, but it has nothing to do with her marriage. Depending on who the Republican candidate is, I'll make up my mind.
Oh, yeah, Bill Clinton lied. At least many women think he lied. Most men, on the other hand, would answer the exact same way he did. A ******** is not sex. Sex is when you actually plug it in. I'm female, but I know this is how men think.
2006-09-18 17:59:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by loryntoo 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not only will I vote for her...I will campaign for her.
Personally I think that "morality" is a sliding scale when it comes to politics...you kind of have to choose the "sins" that make you distrust someone. That does not make it right, but it's the truth. I don't personally look to the government as my moral compass and therefore also do not want them in the personal decisions of my life and body that do not effect other people.
Can I forgive her for making choices within the confines of her marriage...of course, because I'm not IN her marriage. She wasn't the one who cheated, she opted to stay with her marriage.
Would I stay with a man who remotely cheated...nope, never have, the ones who crossed the line went to the curb... but I don't have the vested interest in her relationship to make that decision for her. It is not my place. So are you saying in your opinion ALL women who have a husband who has had any sexual contact with someone other than them are untrustworthy because they didn't divorce them?
For me a politicians position on social issues is where I make a decision...there certainly are personal issues that make me concerned and would make me NOT vote for a candidate....a candidate with an known heavy drug or alcohol past (and should we really respect someone like Bush who touts family values and raised those two girls! please!)
So...bottom line...yeah, would vote for Hilary!
2006-09-19 13:02:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Monkey Queen 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
well she is a women and woman just might be better at running the country
i really dont think her marriage has nothing to do with the country thats her personal life wht if no one knew about it but ill vote fer her if she runs
2006-09-18 21:06:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Abi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What the hell does one have to do with the other? You right wing bible thumpers must think intelligence in foreign affairs and international strategy is somehow measured by the degree of adherence to some antiquated moral code by an otherwise brilliant spouse.
2006-09-18 17:58:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Grist 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Maybe not, but women forgive all the time and that has nothing to do with their effectiveness to do their jobs everyday. How sexist is that?
2006-09-18 17:55:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Diana 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Sorry, I'll try to find a human to vote for if I even vote at all.
Reptoids just don't get my vote.
2006-09-18 18:08:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Oh... your right, let's put someone we know nothing about into the big chair. That's a much better idea.
So... your saying forgiving is a bad thing?
2006-09-18 17:53:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by C P R 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Do apples affect the orange crops?
2006-09-18 18:11:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Schmorgen 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
She bowed and obeyed her husband, Bill, just like a little female slave.
Bill told Jennifer Flowers about how he and Hillary first met: "they were both dating the same girl".
Check it out.
2006-09-18 17:55:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋