English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The current engines are not fast enough for deep space travel. What could we do different to go deeper into space?

2006-09-18 10:47:46 · 11 answers · asked by Video Pod 2 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

11 answers

The ion engine offers promise but as of yet they haven't hooked a atomic reactor to it to get some real power out. Small ion engines to give u acceleration for long missions at the half way point u need to turn around and decelerate. Not a good plan. without some real fusion we don't have a chance.
Sorry guys or girls you got your work cut out for u,get to studying man must leave this earth before it gets over populated.
Good luck

2006-09-18 13:13:39 · answer #1 · answered by JOHNNIE B 7 · 0 0

The huge distances and energy needs of interstellar space travel would virtually require the complete conversion of matter into energy (E=mc2). Currently there is no theoretical basis for suggesting that this can ever be done. Interstellar space travel by humans with return voyages of practical duration is likely to remain in the realm of science fiction.

2006-09-18 11:48:45 · answer #2 · answered by Strangerbarry 4 · 0 2

the present superb theory, which may be waiting to realize an considerable fraction of sunshine speed (something like as much as ten %, something like that) is the nuclear pulse detonation propulsion. It exists purely on paper, yet theoretically it may artwork. extremely you have a deliver with a great radiation and blast shelter in back. The deliver periodically drops a hydrogen bomb, waits until ultimately it extremely is in the back of the shelter, and then blammo. a selection of of propulsion and intensely affordable. no longer a great mushroom cloud btw, in area nuclear explosions happen without air molecules to ignite so as that they provide the impact of being extra placid. the toughest component to establishing a deliver like it is you will could desire to positioned ask your self absorbers between the shelter and the deliver to maintain the deliver from being torn aside. ultimately they figured it out with a 2-degree ask your self absorption equipment. Ships like this for interstellar voyages could could desire to be outfitted notably great inspite of the incontrovertible fact that. great as in many situations as great simply by fact the ISS it is huge. it may be sturdy for a colonization considering you are able to desire to in effective condition lots of folk onto the deliver. If there have been a prepared inhabitants, a deliver like this may be outfitted interior a pair of many years, perhaps 3 or 4, and then it may desire to set off off on a journey to the Centauri equipment and at height performance attain it in approximately 50 years, it is vitally rapid for interstellar return and forth. <> in case you prefer imaginary celeb trek stuff in keeping with imprecise nonsensical theories, bypass with whoever thumbed my answer... yet there is not any such component as ion propulsion yet, and in all probability isn't interior the subsequent a hundred years. Nuclear pulse detonation is the only one that has actual been designed and could desire to realistically be outfitted interior here couple of many years. It replaced into first proposed interior the early area age and it extremely is already properly understood.

2016-10-17 05:39:56 · answer #3 · answered by janski 4 · 0 0

Electrostatic ion thruster coupled with solar power will be used in the short term till the most power full one is developed.

2006-09-18 11:23:11 · answer #4 · answered by Dr M 5 · 0 1

1) Nuclear fusion.
2) Solar wind.

2006-09-18 12:05:57 · answer #5 · answered by · 5 · 0 1

Matter/Anti-matter energy conversion (Warp Core)

Fission is promising... but if we could harness the gravitational force of a mini-blackhole, we can just "pull" spcae closer momentarily...

or we can always pray for a quantum singularity (wormhole)

2006-09-18 10:56:38 · answer #6 · answered by dunce002917 2 · 0 1

Nuclear Fusion of helium-3, which we can harvest frim the moon, where the solar wind blows it, in profusion.

2006-09-18 11:21:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Nuclear.

2006-09-18 10:53:42 · answer #8 · answered by FlashGordon 3 · 0 1

gravity distortion systems

alsoo called antigravity, zero point enegry

take alook

2006-09-18 12:32:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The fuel cell.

2006-09-18 10:49:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers