i want a list of all impeachable offenses made by george bushes cabinet?

Answer 1

Pending a thorough investigation, from an independent commission, I am relatively sure that most if not all of the following allegations will be provable impeachable offenses.

1. Conspiring to attack the U.S.A. (911 attack).

2. Attacking the WTC and killing approx. 3,000 citizens and attacking the Pentagon and killing 125 U.S. Military personnel.

3. Attacking members of the U.S. government using an U.S. military strain of anthrax.

4. Covering up the 911 attack with an extremely limited 911 commission investigation.

5. Revealing Valarie Plames name in an effort to stop her husband from negating Iraq's nuclear ambitions, by diclassifying the name, just days earlier.

6. Lying to the public and congress about WMD in Iraq.

7. Starting an Illegal war in Iraq.

9. Killing over 2,000 troops and wounding approximately 30,000 troops in Iraq and killing approximately 130,000 Iraqi citizens.

10. Attempting to take control of Iraq's land in an effort to steal their oil.

Here is some evidence supporting these allegations:

The official government story is that 911 was orchestrated by Al Queda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: see picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6oAeK1dlHs&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=9

There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEuDeU4IZjE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtBGKSZNWB4&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=7

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite

A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron yeilded an explosive, called Thermate. Also, see picture of WTC beam possibly cut using a demolition cutting charge (Thermate) or perhaps cut by an Iron Workers torch during rescue operations. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

These factors point to a controled demolition of the buildings and thus an inside job. We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

There is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

There is also good motive too. The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), were convinced that America was running short of fossil fuel, so they planned the invasion of Iraq. This plan included the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq: Like another Pearl Harbor. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

Answer 2

Bush committed perjury by telling the congress (and the rest of us)
that he KNEW that the Iraqi's had weapons of mass destruction.
Since this was done by a Constitutionally required session, he
cannot claim that it was an "offhand comment" - it had the full
force and effect of a Presidential legal statement.

The lie was simple: That he KNEW the Iraqi's had weapons
of mass destruction.

More and more congresspeople agree that he violated the
law by instituting the various NSA wiretapping programs
without congressional OK.

Perjury and exceeding the power granted to him by the
Constitution are both "high crimes and misdimeanors"
which fit the Constitution's definition of when someone
can be impeached.

Note that Clinton's impeachment was over him telling
the congress that he hadn't had sex with Ms. Lewinski.
The worst result of that lie is that Americans would no
longer trust the President.

Bush's lie has killed more Americans that died in 9/11
and 40000 Iraqis.

As to the rest of the cabinet, its rather hard to tell.
It is very likely that Cheney violated the law by telling
that reporter about Valerie Flame, assuming that it
was already public knowledge.

Its probable that Karl Rove directly lied to the
special prosecutor investigating that case - certainly
about what he knew, if not what he said.

However, the Bush perjury and wiretapping are both
issues of fact and not speculation.

Answer 3

None...Get a life you liberal prick...Only a Liberal would want to see our country torn apart by watching our president get impeached and tried on war crimes. You people make me sick...So just keep reading the NYT (assuming you can read) and watching CNN) you ignorant inbreaders!

Answer 4

Okay, as soon as you prove who has committed treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Answer 5

OK that's easy.



None.

Answer 6

None so far.

Answer 7

How much time do you have?

Answer 8

Oh that's easy! None.

Answer 9

Ok.....here we go.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.