Not all Republicans are against him, only the sensible ones, like John McCain. He has more experience with torture than anyone else in the Capital.
2006-09-18 10:18:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tofu Jesus 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Some of his staunchest supporters (Senators, John Warner, Lyndsey Graham) are now against him on this issue.
If I had to take sides on the issue of torturing people, I'd have to go with Mc Cain. Mc Cain was a POW in North Vietnam for five years. He knows first hand what it feels like to be tortured.
As for your last statement that Republican Party=Failed party, that's simply not true. There are still a lot of good, honest Republicans out there like John Mc Cain (I'm a Democrat by the way). I just hope they can wrest control of the party back from the lunatic right wing fringe.
In 2000, I wanted a Mc Cain vs. Gore match up.
2006-09-18 10:28:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ed A 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Go Bush.
Bush is not the greatest at communication but he does not sway just to please the liberals and democrats out there. He has a mission and is going to see it thru.
The economy is in great condition, we have had the lowest unemployment rating in years.
I appreciate a president that prays for the nation and tries to protect it.
I would like to second the answer about slapping whoever is filling your head with that Anti Bush Garbage.
Most of the soldiers serving this country stand by Bush.
Go Bush, Go Republican Party!
2006-09-18 10:22:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by CLEMVIER 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bush loves to kill people? Most of them are American citizens? What sort of BS are you slinging? Do you have a source to back that claim up?
If you want to argue the merits of the policy on holding terrorism suspects, fine. I'm not crazy about the way it's being done either. But the hyperbole makes you look like a shrieking harpy.
2006-09-18 10:23:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chris S 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Torture gives terrible intelligent, John McCain gave some names of the Green Bay Packers when he was tortured.
2006-09-18 10:22:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush changed into hostile to Embryonic Stem cellular analyze. because he believed that killing a stay embryo changed into incorrect, plus it truly is been stumbled on that the stem cells in cord blood is a lot more advantageous useful than embryonic stem cells.
2016-11-27 23:01:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by biesecker 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
When you go to your 7th grade social studies class tomorrow, slap your teacher for the BS that they've filled your head with.
2006-09-18 10:18:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by salaamrashaad 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
More Bullsh*t.
Do you give fair trials in your country?
I notice that you didn't complain about the be-headings. You must think that is okay.
2006-09-18 10:22:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
probably the same amount of damnocrats that kill unborn babies in the name of "rights" Why do damnocrats love terrorist more than their own unborn children!
2006-09-18 10:19:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
New sound bite,cut and rat on them.
2006-09-18 10:27:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by kman1830 5
·
0⤊
1⤋