Tell me about it!
I knew I was getting older when I went from briefs to boxers. and from lace-up shoes to loafers.
COMFORT is the name of the game!
George Foreman clothes are the best!
2006-09-18 09:26:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
definately a sign of age, unless your pregnant you shouldn't touch them with a ten foot barge pole. And, no boys, beer bellies don't count! My mum wears them she's nearly 60, she started wearing them when she hit her 40's. They should come with a little warning voice..." AWWOOOGGAAA, AWWOOOGGAA YOU ARE TOO YOUNG! STEP AWAY FROM THE GARMENT! WEAR THESE AND YOU WILL NEVER WEAR ANYTHING ELSE EVER AGAIN!! AWWOOOGGAAA!! DANGER, DANGER, WILL ROBINSON!"
2006-09-19 06:30:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by bacardipinapple 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol i think there great and I'm only 28 my 5 year old needs them just now she's very tall for her age but has no waist to hold anything up
2006-09-18 16:37:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by claire 'n' kidz 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure its a sign of age, but more likely to be a sign of putting weight on. lol
2006-09-18 16:28:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by bizzybee 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes its a sign of old age
2006-09-18 16:29:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mopar Muscle Gal 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, it means that you are getting nearer and nearer to the door of the local nursing home .
2006-09-18 16:34:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mrs Captain 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes - absolutely...Age - the neverending slide into fashion-unconscious -comfort -seeking -dotage
2006-09-18 16:26:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by helmut cheez 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Age, definitely.
What you need is a younger person to shop with, their horror of these items will help you resist.
2006-09-18 16:32:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. It's a sign that you need to lose some weight.
2006-09-18 16:53:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by inquiringmind 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It just simply means that you crossed over from being mildly pretentious and immature to more reasonable and practical.
You remember that its not ther clothes who make the person, but the other wat around.
2006-09-18 16:31:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by *Ginelle* 3
·
1⤊
0⤋