English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Supposing it took three to reproduce another human, Man, Woman and a third kind with a different type of sexual equipment.

What would you think would be the advanteges and dis- advanteges. what would you think about it would you like it
Serious answers will be treated with the contempt they deserve

2006-09-18 09:13:17 · 7 answers · asked by philipscottbrooks 5 in Social Science Other - Social Science

7 answers

I think that there would be less unwanted pregnancies and abortions as reproduction would take planning. Communication would improve in relationships as 3 'people' would be involved in discussions. Wow, what a weird yet thought provoking question! ha ha :-)

2006-09-18 09:27:41 · answer #1 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

the third kind would have to be a lawyer :
advantages: 1. you would have recorded proof who was in the wrong when it all goes Pete Tong.
2. The child support agency can ask a third party who did what and maybe get something resembling the truth.
Disadvantages: 1. Sexual equipment would be a dictaphone and some kind of contract paperwork.
2. one woman is expensive enough without a lawyer present.

2006-09-18 09:54:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nah - i think two people have enough problems as it is!! Men claim not to understand women and women claim not to understand men - throw another into the equation and you have divorce courts and custody hearings backed up til the year dot!!

And it would ruin the fluidity of the book names - Men are from Mars, Woman are from Venus and the other one comes from somewhere else. Just doesn't have a nice ring!

2006-09-18 09:30:34 · answer #3 · answered by libbyft 5 · 0 0

if "most of the time" single children were born it would take at least three attempts to reproduce in order for one new possible attempt on reproduction, causing the parents to reproduce more often, probably increasing the population, making the current natural resources insufficient, maybe out of more need science would have advanced faster... i don't know

2006-09-18 09:52:04 · answer #4 · answered by the_guy_with_the_thing 2 · 0 0

I'm sure if it was more fun there'd be plenty of people around telling us it was a sin. Dayum freaks.
It would get even more expensive at the bar though....you might have to buy two people drinks to get a f***.

2006-09-18 09:39:16 · answer #5 · answered by Mr Glenn 5 · 0 0

What like two woman and a guy with a turkey baster?

2006-09-18 09:22:21 · answer #6 · answered by yeahbutnobut 3 · 0 0

I just spent an hour pondering your question. I won't forget this day for a while.

"Hey you two, anybody got a cigarette???"

2006-09-18 09:19:02 · answer #7 · answered by gimpalomg 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers