No, but Warner is bound to get injured. Bulger is an above average QB. Have them sweeten the trade, get a WR or RB with the deal.
2006-09-18 09:54:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by JoseIIV 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, kurt warner is backed up by Matt lieert and you know dennis green wants to test him out so in warner has another bad week expext lienert to come in. Also Marc Bulger is on a team that likes to pass but also run which means if steven jackson can come in and averege 5 yards a carry look for bulger to run alot of play action deep.
2006-09-18 15:20:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Brad K 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Right now, Warner is the better QB.
Long term, it is unlikely that Warner will make it through the season. He's missed 35 games in 4 years.
If you can tolerate the risk, hang on to Warner. If you are more conservative, Bulger will likely be healthier and should increase his productivity as the season progresses. I think he's still adjusting the the changes on offense.
2006-09-18 15:38:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kurt Warner.
2006-09-18 15:12:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by dabean003 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO WAY...Keep Warner....No Mike MArtz=no marc bulger
2006-09-19 00:53:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Michael D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Where did he get plummer? Anyway...it depends. If you league is a keeper, take the trade because this is Warner's last year. OR...you could pickup Lienart because WHEN warner gets hurt, Matt will get the nod at QB.
2006-09-18 15:16:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by bigjim6201 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd keep Warner, he has a solid RB, and two of the best WR's in the game.
2006-09-18 16:34:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Drunk365 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
don't do it. warner is putting up good numbers this season...
He could get hurt anytime though, which is a concern. Even so, plummer has been disappointing thus far.
2006-09-18 15:13:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by akristel2003 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
stick wid kurt
2006-09-18 16:28:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by falconsruleeaglessuck 2
·
0⤊
0⤋