2006-09-18 06:20:51 · 25 answers · asked by native 3 in Family & Relationships ➔ Other - Family & Relationships
No I don't think I would. I would rather give an egg and they can get it implanted, but not actually go through pregnancy for someone. No way.
2006-09-18 06:23:43 · answer #1 · answered by Susa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, thats completly absurd to me. I would not go around having to take insanly good care of my self, get stretch marks, go on an emotional roller coaster, take off work, give up dating for 9 months for anybody. then after you've gone through all of that and bonded completly with it you have to give it away! If that sounds self centered, then you gotta wonder whats so self centered about the couple that can't have kids that they can't freaking adopt a kid. There is so many kids that need good loving homes. Way too many to ever justify having a baby for someone else.
2006-09-18 13:55:14 · answer #2 · answered by Lisa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, i could never have a baby for someone else. If you carry a baby for 9 months you wont want to give it away because you will get attached. If you are giving it to a friend or loved one then you will see your baby alot and hearing him/her calling another woman mummy, then when the child finds out that there mother isn't there mother then they will want to look for you and might hate you for giving them up, although they might love you or thinkin about someone else who can't have a baby.
2006-09-18 13:28:46 · answer #3 · answered by holly 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I always thought I could if someone wanted a baby and couldn't have one. But then I went through the process of just donating my eggs and realized how attached I was to my eggs. I would be way too attached to a baby I carried for 9 months.
2006-09-18 13:26:16 · answer #4 · answered by wonderwoman41477 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would do it if a women and a man could not have a baby and they wanted one really bad. I would do it especially for a sister or a friend.
2006-09-18 13:23:07 · answer #5 · answered by red1967 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldnt because you would get attatched to the baby ..its very easy for women to say they wouldnt but you would..well most decent people would there are plenty of women who have no maternal feelings at all for their children..which is pure evil.
2006-09-18 13:23:34 · answer #6 · answered by fajita 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it were for a relative I would definitely have a baby for them, but for other people strangers or people I didn't know very well. I wouldn't be able to do it.
At least with my family I would be able to see that child everyday maybe, see how it's treated, and see how happy my relative is to have that child. I would know it's okay. I know it wouldn't be my child that it would be theirs but its something I would want to be able to do.
2006-09-18 13:28:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I'm not a kid person, so I wouldn't want to bear a child for myself or someone else.
I'm sure I'll get tons of 'thumbs down' for that, but that's my choice and my body and my lifestyle. I don't need children to feel fulfilled and I don't need them to remind me I'm a woman.
2006-09-18 13:33:15 · answer #8 · answered by 4eyed zombie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I could have kids, I think that I would. I want a child so badly, but I don't know anyone who can have kids that would do it for me. So, I would do it for someone else.
2006-09-18 13:23:24 · answer #9 · answered by Maymie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ten years ago I would have said yes if it were for a very close friend. Now after having a child and having him die of SIDS I would have to say no.
2006-09-18 13:23:11 · answer #10 · answered by theoriginalquestmaker 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋