2006-09-18 06:16:07 · 19 answers · asked by Zayne P 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Other - Arts & Humanities
Why can't you believe in both? A higher power caused The Big Bang Theory - seems more plausible.
2006-09-18 06:19:27 · answer #1 · answered by Paley Pale 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Higher power, and I'll give you a simple example to explain my point. This world, and the entire universe for that matter, is complex. To say that it all started from a big bang of randomness is silly. That's like taking a computer, a complex machine, and saying someone built it by taking a bunch of random computer parts and they threw some solder in there, and shook the box so that random parts stuck together, and suddenly a computer was formed.....No, that's virtually impossible. A higher being must have made this universe.
2006-09-18 06:21:15 · answer #2 · answered by Amanda 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's obvious: both. There's the evidence for the Big Bang, and whatever brought it about as a higher power than me.
2006-09-18 06:19:05 · answer #3 · answered by holden 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The big bang theory and evolution.
Darwin hit the nail on the head
2006-09-18 06:24:36 · answer #4 · answered by utg_45 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why could they not be one and the same? It does not matter one bit what I BELIEVE, only what is factual. And that I don't know. However, I don't take anything on faith these days, and the scientists are working on an overall unifying theory. We'll see what they come up with, but I doubt they'll be a final ( ha ha) answer in my lifetime.
2006-09-18 06:22:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
>Chaos thought says there'll be exponential advance in line with preliminary situations. you are able to no longer return - in fact, a device can go from order to illness, yet no longer from illness to reserve. Ahem. that's no longer chaos thought, that's the regulation of entropy, that's a regulation we are able to't be one hundred% specific applies outdoors our own universe (or maybe, for that count, interior it). >Now, how ought to the universe have began as an orderly lump of mass, and after it exploded, it developed galaxies with orderly rotations, orderly image voltaic structures, or maybe this planet with orderly existence on it, if those theories are superb, and there is not any larger means? i think of making use of the be conscious 'orderly' right this is deceptive at ultimate and in simple terms undeniable incorrect at worst. there is not any inherent 'order' in galaxies, stars, planets or existence varieties which could no longer be defined because of the fact the effect of persistently making use of the organic rules of our universe over billions of years. in addition to, assuming there exists a god in simple terms pushes the subject one step farther back. that's to assert, if a god is sensible, then it may desire to be 'orderly' to boot, yet would not that require that IT actually have a clothier of its own? yet then there must be no 'first god' to create all the different gods, and no god ought to ever have existed interior the 1st place. The greater smart determination, as I see it, is that order CAN upward thrust up out of chaos, supplied that's the superb form of chaos. it extremely is substantiated with workstation simulations.
2016-10-15 03:21:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i believe that any higher power who has been involved in observing the antics and stupidity of the human race for any period of time deserves a big bang, eh? ;-)
2006-09-18 08:13:10 · answer #7 · answered by drakke1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are they mutually exclusive? Heck, are either of them anything other than A Priori theories--best, untestable guesses based on what seems likely to us right now?
2006-09-18 06:29:30 · answer #8 · answered by The Armchair Explorer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that God said it and BANG it happened
2006-09-18 06:20:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
A combination of the two
2006-09-18 06:23:14 · answer #10 · answered by Crazymom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋