Only for the sado/masachists...you know the ones...into chains and leather whippings or beatings, etc.
2006-09-18 06:04:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Public flogging wouldn't incite a riot lustful or not. Lots of public floggings on record but no riots just pitty.
2006-09-18 09:26:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by chickenger 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree yet who ought to arrest them. The Republicans are afraid to face up to thugs. What ought to Holder do if a white team like the Black Panthers positioned out a fulfillment on Sharpton or Jackson. Or the Panther thugs.
2016-11-27 22:06:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by cootes 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmm
2006-09-18 06:10:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Lustful Riots", you either have a riot or you don't, I fail to see anything lustful about it. Now to the question, NO!!!!
2006-09-18 06:06:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by bobemac 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nice insightful answer foneengr, you must have thought long and hard on that one.
2006-09-18 06:15:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Wiley 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
the big ones
2006-09-18 06:02:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by t y 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
perhaps they would but very hard to now
2006-09-18 07:07:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jubei 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
for sure
2006-09-18 06:03:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It might.
2006-09-18 06:52:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Judas Rabbi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋