English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

South Africa.
It's stable and representative of a large region- Africa.
A lot of conditions would have to be met first though.

2006-09-18 22:03:48 · answer #1 · answered by stj 4 · 0 0

If you want to have a third world country respresented on the security council, then it should be Thailand. They are a very stable country which has been supportive of advancement, etc.

2006-09-18 05:23:04 · answer #2 · answered by Schmickrod 2 · 0 0

India, if any.

Otherwise the law regarding permanent security council seat should be repealed.

2006-09-18 05:20:56 · answer #3 · answered by mushtaqehind 3 · 0 0

Democrat

2006-09-18 05:19:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Dude, A) There are 5 (not 3) everlasting contributors of the risk-free practices Council. the united states of u.s., Russia, uk, France, China. It grow to be set up that way whilst the UN grow to be began in direction of the top of WW2. in case you recognize historic previous you will see that those are the 5 leading Allied powers in the time of WW2. that is not an twist of destiny, via fact the UN grow to be set up by potential of the Allies. B) Inida grow to be nonetheless area of the British Empire whilst the UN grow to be set up. India would not even have been considered for everlasting seat on the risk-free practices Council at that element. C) it is achievable to get momentary seats on the risk-free practices Council. They rotate. i don't understand how long the rustic gets the seat or how they are allotted. i think of they are elected someway interior the UN. bypass seem at Wikipedia or Google. D) everlasting seats at the instant are not and in no way have been available. it is probable that they in no way would be. there grow to be a brilliant form of talk interior the 80s approximately Japan getting an enduring seat. there grow to be some talk approximately Germany getting one too. it is all it has ever been, purely talk. the priority is, if the UN began to monkey around with the UN shape, the 5 international locations that now have everlasting seats ought to loose those seats. the united kingdom and France are not as massive as they was once, they'd actually see themselves kicked off in prefer of somebody else, so as that they'd veto any modifications to the form that ought to deliver approximately them loosing their everlasting seat sometime. Russia remains extraordinarily important, yet they at the instant are not #2 anymore like they have been for the time of the days of the U.S.... they'd not loose their seat suited away, yet they are able to certianly see that if the everlasting seats bypass away they'd loose theirs sometime... extraordinarily if the different everlasting contributors ganged up on them and pushed for it. the united states of u.s. would be frightened approximately all the little 0.33 international Countires going off on an "anti-imperialist" rant and balloting them off. China in all risk has the main secure seat of all. So no, India did not reject an enduring seat on the risk-free practices Council via fact no such seat grow to be ever, or probable will ever be, offered to all and dissimilar.

2016-12-18 12:28:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Italy. (Italy is not technically part of the third world, but no one has told the Italians.)

Love Jack

2006-09-18 05:44:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

None of them

2006-09-18 05:19:04 · answer #7 · answered by Chief BaggageSmasher 7 · 0 1

None.

2006-09-18 05:19:32 · answer #8 · answered by yahoohoo 6 · 0 1

None...

2006-09-18 05:18:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers