Should the public have the ability to fire any elected official of representative government at any time?

Question

What methods or means should be utilized to throw them out?

Answer 1

I do believe we should have that right if the crime or lack of work ethic is not there. I believe it should be a majority vote to take someone out of office. They work for us supposedly so why shouldn't we have the right to fire them for not doing their job.

Answer 2

Not yes, but HELL yes!! Some officials have too much power, and become above the law. Too many documents are hidden from the public under the so called national security BS. If any official that is elected by the people, should be thrown out of office by the people. If they can be put in office by election, then they should be thrown out of office by election. This is how it is supposed to work now, but it's who has the most money to reach the most voters dictates who gets elected. We all know from experience, officials can buy their way into office. If any official is caught doing something wrong, or is supected of doing something wrong, then it should go to a vote within the month as to their fate. One better; all officials should be subjected to a random lie detector test, just like employees are subjected to random drug test. Why don't they have to take drug tests? They should have to prove they are on the up an up by a lie detector test! They should never be immune from any question that anybody has to ask them. It is not a Democracy if the elected officials are allowed to live by a different set of rules than everybody else. If they fail the drug and/or lie detector test, they should be relieved of their duties right then and there. The people should have a right to demand honesty, and integrity by anyone elected to office, and they should never be allowed to hide behind this national security thing. Once an offical is caught in any kind of lie, they should be thrown out on their ear!! Have Fun!

Answer 3

There is already a criminal justice system, ethics panels and the Impeachment process to keep criminals from serving as public officials. But there should not be a recall system or another system of ousting elected officials just because they do things people don't like.

If we had a system like that everytime the President had a down week the opposing party would start proceedings to remove him. That would slow down government and nothing would occur. After happening a few times elected officials would become gun shy and not do anything that anyone would consider controversial. That would stop the government dead.

Answer 4

In America, the public can fire elected officials every 2 or 4 years depending on what office they hold. It's called an election. I am more concerned about lifetime appointees, those are the ones you really have to worry about.

Answer 5

certain, elected officials might want to be held to a more effective wide-spread than the final inhabitants. With that stated, I easily have 2 concepts: a million. I actually position self belief in peoples' capacity to regulate. preserving someone to a more effective wide-spread would not recommend putting them out to dry even as their grimy laundry is uncovered. a real degree of a guy is how he finally responds to his failing not that he has failings contained in the first position. 2. this is the peoples', by elections, and the courts, by civil and criminal court docket circumstances, duty to carry them in charge if favor be. I completely disagree with yet another commenter's concepts on Vitter. I figured i might want to provide some counter arguments. it really is what the commenter stated: "Yeah, Yeah David Vitter did not resign. the adaptation is that Vitter develop into in touch with a prostitute between 1999 and 2001, his call develop into discovered contained in the Madams black e book in 2007 so there have been no contact for 6 years. He admitted to his movements to his spouse years previous to the study or perhaps as the investigators did ask, he spoke truthfully." a million. First, Vitter's movements are easily criminal. What Weiner has finished is immoral, a minimum of on the grounds that he has been married, yet not unlawful. 2. If it really is so major for elected officials to be truthful than how is telling lies about your movements by omission for 6 years extra virtuous than being untruthful verbally for 2 weeks? those are both that come at present to concepts. finally, the answer to having elected officials to are above reproach is for us to pick those who're have a intense moral wide-spread for themselves. we stay in a democratic society and we, the voters, ought to pick adult men and females who're useful and moral.

Answer 6

In America the short answer is yes! In some other countries merely asking this Q would / could result in your hands being cut off or your eye being plucked out. But I digress... our electoral system provides for the "re-call" of any elected official at any time. There are, of course, rules pertaining to this action much like the rules covering debates in schools, unions, or other civic groups. Check it out.

Answer 7

I think the public should be able to. However, the only way that this could happen would be for the elected officials to make it the law. Do you really think the politicians are going to make a law saying that we can get rid of them?

Answer 8

That's what recalls are for. People petition for a special election to vote again. Not all jurisdictions have recall. It's a right given by statute. The citizens of CA famously recalled Gov. Grey Davis three years ago.

Answer 9

You would have to file a recall petition and then get enough signatures on it to force a recall election to vote the person out of office.

Answer 10

I think, since they serve the public, the public should be able to impeach them. However, a ruling court with balance of power for trial with fairness to all. Hey I'm an idealist lol