As someone from the UK with an unbiased view I am curious why this hasn't happened. The evidence of WTC 7 (Larry Silverstien admitting he gave the order to "pull" it) being brought down in a controlled demolition proves that the other buildings were brought down the same way, as to plant demo charges would take weeks of pre-planning and the buildings fell on the same day they were hit. Sensible answers only please.
2006-09-18 02:06:44 · 17 answers · asked by stuntdouble_uk 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Updated for dannynoddy's request. This was the 1st one i found. Not great quality but its on a zillion documentarys all around the world. I'm sure you can find a better version. Here's the link:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329
2006-09-18 14:26:30 · update #1
Plato asked the same question millennia ago. The way he phrased it was "Who will protect us from our protectors?"
2006-09-18 02:21:07 · answer #1 · answered by beast 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would imagine that when you ask for only sensible answers, you mean only answers that support your point of view, which is anything but sensible. I am not seeing how a controlled demolition of a damaged building has something to do with the initial cause of the damage, but then I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist.
GWBush hasn't been arrested because there haven't been any formal charges filed and there hasn't been an official investigation into his role in the September 11 attacks. If you believe that you have real evidence that implicates the president in these attacks, perhaps you should file charges against him, but I could pretty much guarantee that there wouldn't be any legal action taken against Mr, Bush until he leaves office. Which won't be much longer- just about a year and a half.
I apologize for not being as unbiased and sensible as you are, but I'm doing the best I can under the circumstances.
2006-09-18 02:20:12 · answer #2 · answered by anyone 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have to ask a sensible question to get a sensible answer don't you? As you said it takes weeks to plant demo charges and I am still wondering how they did this right under the noses of the thousands that work in WTC not to mention all the experts involved who would all have to keep their mouths shut. It's a non starter,lets assume for a second that Bush had anything to do with it,that assumes a level of evil genius that would make it next to impossible to ever be able to bring him to justice,because he would have every base covered. As a person who has had a little experience with explosives myself I also find it hard to believe those buildings came down right into their footprints as neatly as they did,it defies logic,not once but twice. But I have seen no evidence that goes beyond conjecture at this point and anyone who sticks their neck out for evidence no stronger than hearsay is only asking to have their head lopped off.
2006-09-18 02:17:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I watched a documentary that gives so many proofs that there was a big plot in this thing, and Bin Laden either had nothing to do with it or he was helped by an inside force which I have no doubt about. I wish all the people can watch and listen to what I heard to see how clear it was, the problem is I live in Dubai, and these documentaries are probably never shown in the US
2006-09-18 02:14:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
My last post covered the topic of fanatacism and here I seem to run into it again..The far left has created such a picture that it has gained willing and unthinking followers. When does a radical theory establish proof of anything? The left will not pull out any stops to make condemnation toward this man.. whether absolute lies or fabrications, they continue their dastardly deeds.. apparently convincingly enough to garner believers and more conspiracy theorists... to the point of fanatacism.
2006-09-18 02:14:38 · answer #5 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The animals rights brigade say it's wrong to incarcerate a chimp in a jail cell.
2006-09-18 02:09:59 · answer #6 · answered by Tish P 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush was not responsible for the 9/11 attacks, how can you say that any 1 man was resposible except for Osama Bin Laden.
2006-09-18 02:09:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
No evidence linking him to the events. I do not think it was the president. I believe it was his father and his CIA connections. His son is not bright enough.
2006-09-18 02:16:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lord.... what planet are you on. Try some critical thinking before you tell the world what a fool you are.
2006-09-18 02:16:49 · answer #9 · answered by mlwasp 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
no one is going to step up and arrest bush. plus if someone arrested bush they'd be tried for treason and face imprisionment and/or lose their usa citizenship
2006-09-18 02:13:41 · answer #10 · answered by baddrose268 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋