2006-09-18 01:59:15 · 24 answers · asked by cool runings 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Neither. Both have made a right mess of things and seem incapable of doing a good job!
The way Bush handled the poor inhabitants affected by Hurricane Katrina is terrible. Wanted to finish his holiday rather than come back as an emergency to sort things out.
And regarding the war, I don't know what they were thinking both Bush + Blair and why they still are keeping soldiers out there.
And what about the "weapons of mass destruction"? What was that all about?! A wild goose chase!!
These leaders are a waste of time!!
2006-09-18 03:49:09 · answer #1 · answered by lelinafed 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Looks like Tony Blair follows George Bush's lead anyway.
2006-09-18 02:12:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both of them are very bed leader, but I will propabbly chose Tony Blair if bush happen to die. Because he is a follower of bush without but he can not lead.
2006-09-18 02:08:04 · answer #3 · answered by Nina 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None of them. The two of them are losers
I rather have Mr T
Blair is sinking our country and making the terrorists attack us.
The British should paint on 10 Downing Street: Attack here, please.
Here lives the loser that is fighting a finished war that they, Bush and Blair lost. We are also losing British troops by the second. Who are we to blame? The one that started this. Tony Blair.
My opinion doesn't end here, but I have sumerised
Laura
2006-09-19 01:41:28 · answer #4 · answered by lpetela 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tony Blair!!
2006-09-18 02:00:49 · answer #5 · answered by xhoneybeex 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. Bush is an ignorant moron, who was well prepared to use his first veto of his presidency to stop stem cell research, the possible cure and solution to cancer. And the whole fiasco with him having the lower IQ of that of a gnat doesn't help. This man doesn't makedecisions for the people of America, he has assembled the richest cabinet in American history. JUST SHOWS THAT MONEY TALKS!!! And effectively causing the deaths of thousands of Iraqi civilians, and hundreds of innocent people while he was hunting Bin Laden wasn't a good idea, was it, Dubya, eh? Blair is a bone-less **** with less integrity than a toilet seat with every known disease smothering it. He will do whatever he thinks is POPULAR, not what is RIGHT. A morally flexible man like him should not be in a position of power where it can effectively decide the course of our lives. His whole ****-up with the NHS and trying to make privately owned school trusts is madness!!! The one thing the Government don't like is spending money. And in their "ultimate wisdom" they have decided to go to war with Iraq. And in their "ultimate wisdom", they also decided it was a good idea to cut the defence budget, resulting in my dad possibly losing his job in the Amry and me not having a career in the Army either. Sorry, guys! lol you got me on a rant! I said my piece.........................
2006-09-18 02:24:15 · answer #6 · answered by shadowrunneruk 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush
2006-09-18 02:28:16 · answer #7 · answered by Infinity 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blair, at least he did'nt fix the voting system to get into power!
England has had its day of being the most powerful country in the world. Unfortunately thats what America wants now and is prepared to exterminate anyone who gets in the way.
2006-09-18 02:01:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Blair is a good man but I think he is a puppet to bush.I've always liked Bush,but now I dont.
I chose Blair
2006-09-18 02:26:40 · answer #9 · answered by pops 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. I don't think any government leader does a good job, past or present. There is always a large amount of sleaze and corruption going on in the parties. They get too much money and are having too much of a good time and it is ruining normal peoples lives. These idiots are making decisions for our country and we are the ones paying the price.
2006-09-18 02:10:28 · answer #10 · answered by koolkatt 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋