2006-09-18 01:45:00 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Because we don't yet have instruments that can obtain the data to develop the theories we need. But scientists are learning more about the Universe all the time, and ideas are becoming more and more sophisticated.
2006-09-18 01:46:30 · answer #1 · answered by DavidK93 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem in resolving the origin I expect is due to our"human" understanding of time. Astronomy observes the universe from one point of reference that is the estimated age of the earth and estimation of distances from points in the universe from which light travels. As these are "estimations" the actual era in which the big bang occurred could be out by one million or billions of years.
The question whether the big bang was one incident
or is the universe made up of both a stable time and matter
along beside a unstable process of the big bang.
This could mean that there are older stable parts of the universe and unstable new parts being formed else where much like geological part of the earth.
This concept of older stable universe existing with newer unstable universe would mean that there is no one specific point of origin but the universe is a interconnected entity of old and new. The question of origin implies that there is only one point or one source if there is more than one place in the universe then science should be looking for the origins of the universe not a origin.
2006-09-18 09:27:57 · answer #2 · answered by alfred jarry jnr 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this is a difficult question for even the scientists . time and distance is the largest hurdle . example mars is just up the road , if you get my drift , but most astronomers look through telescopes which objects appear light years away ( and I'm not going into the technical jargon ) . effectively what we are seeing , or indeed hearing about through the eyes of astronomers , has taken so long to be relayed to us here on planet earth , we can't describe or consume all the information --- we could indeed as a planet not exist -- before the data is received to understand -- where to from here !!!
2006-09-18 09:08:46 · answer #3 · answered by bill g 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Explaining of origin of universe needs deeper understanding of various events which are currently happening and that exactly is what scientists are doing now. It will take lot of time to understand whole events that takes place/taking place/ will take place in this universe, before proposing the final explanation.
2006-09-18 08:57:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because God created the Universe and did not explain it in the Bible.
2006-09-18 08:53:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The lack of available physical evidence.
2006-09-18 08:47:45 · answer #6 · answered by Robert M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this is why. neither side will ever be proved. to prove creation would prove the existence of God (or a higher power or whatever) and that would make faith obsolete. it'll never happen. and to prove evolution (macro- the big bang) would be to prove that God doesn't exist and that'll never happen because He does.
2006-09-18 08:53:38 · answer #7 · answered by practicalwizard 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hi nice question.....They are keep on exploring.....there are some other theories like multiverse....and blak holes etc
2006-09-18 08:48:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because they were not there and no time device to take them there.
2006-09-18 08:54:06 · answer #9 · answered by grim_reaper_69 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋