or just perfect timing?
2006-09-17 23:11:18 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/03/attacks.insurance/index.html
2006-09-18 00:09:34 · update #1
A whole lot about 9/11 is fishy.
2006-09-17 23:14:41 · answer #1 · answered by negrito con sabor 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
between the various familiar conspiracy theories of 9/11: New leaseholder construction 7 proprietor, leaseholder, coverage plans holder for the the remainder of the WTC complicated Larry Silverstein has come below scrutiny with the aid of 9/11 conspiracy theorists for a minimum of two motives. One being a assertion he made in a documentary which conspiracy theorists say is suggestive of the intentional demolition of establishing 7, and one being the timing of his bids and means financial constructive factors he grew to become into possibly to make with the shortcoming of the homes. financial constructive factors from Towers' destruction As mentioned on the Larry Silverstein website: In January 2001, Silverstein, via Silverstein residences and Westfield u.s., made a $3.2 billion bid for the hire to the worldwide commerce middle. . . . Silverstein's bid for the hire to the worldwide commerce middle closed on July 24, 2001, in simple terms seven weeks earlier the homes have been destroyed interior the 9-11, 2001 assaults. The coverage plans additionally contained a clause that interior the form of a terrorist attack, the partnership ought to collect the insured value of the valuables and be released from their duties below the ninety 9-365 days hire.
2016-10-15 03:04:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't have the URL, but there is a video out that tells all of the fishy things involved. A demo expert said the towers fell as they would with explosives planted in the building. several fireman said the same thing. Today people listen too well to the official word. Let us not forget 9-11 saved the political careers of Bush and Gulianni.
2006-09-17 23:23:28 · answer #3 · answered by doggiebike 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think we should continue to ask questions until our government releases every secret document relative to this incident. Which will be a long time coming. So for those still interested, it will remain a matter for discussion. And the truth will come out. As much as I want to believe otherwise, there's just one thing that haunts me about who was really in charge of this horrible deadly attack. and that is Osama. This overgrown Arab living in a cave. The mastermind? of this tragedy. This plane and that plane and still another plane and still another....and video of the hijackers...readily available..and yes, the video should have been available...it was just the timing......
and perhaps your question has merit. Perhaps it is a bit fishy..
2006-09-17 23:24:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
"Fishy" only because Silverstein Properties is Jewish owned which goes along with the conspiracy theorists. Silverstein lost billions of dollars on the loss of the WTC.
2006-09-18 03:00:33 · answer #5 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The insurance was only for a fraction of what the building was worth.
2006-09-17 23:21:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
A lot of crazy financial dealing went on just before it all happened. One guy made billions.
Plus I'm getting sick of people who are always chanting 'do your research'. This IS research!
2006-09-17 23:54:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Isn't it normal to arrange for insurance for some buildings you just bought?
2006-09-17 23:16:07 · answer #8 · answered by fiddefura 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Why didn't you do some research first? A few seconds of searching would have saved you much embarrassment...
http://www.911myths.com
http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_insurance.html
2006-09-17 23:37:12 · answer #9 · answered by My Evil Twin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The story sounds fishy.
2006-09-17 23:16:55 · answer #10 · answered by Max 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋