For one of my question yesterday " who is the historical Idiot? I expected an answer from History. Instead of that seven out of four answered that GWB.
2006-09-17 21:32:22 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush was not elected, Bush was "selected". This happened by the corrupt "supreme" court on 12/12/2000, when they decided that Bush won the elections. Split clearly along party lines the "supreme" court decided 5:4 that Bush is the winner, but stating that this is not a precedence and cannot be used as such in future disputes. Strangely enough, because the "supreme" court is supposed to the the last instance and has to set precedences.
The second time around they wanted to avoid such awkwardness and used Diebold and ES&S as providers for voting machines. Diebold is a company with extremely close ties to the Bush junta and ES&S belongs in part to Chuck Hagel(R). Of course this is a blatant conflict of interest, but for our democracy,or the remains thereof, it doesn't really matter anymore, because democracy as defined died on 12/12/2000.
2006-09-17 22:40:07 · answer #1 · answered by The answer man 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He stole both the 2000 and '04 elections by using underhanded tactics! But public opinion turned on him recently, that's almost two years after he got elected for the second and last time!
2006-09-17 21:58:20 · answer #2 · answered by brian 2010 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't hate him. I voted for him. I see by a lot of the answers you already have that people tend to believe the news media with this nonsense of stolen election, ah get real folks he didn't steal the election, turn off the TV.
2006-09-18 02:10:55 · answer #3 · answered by marge8710 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama's pores and skin colour positive would not difficulty me, he looks in basic terms high quality. What bothers me is the bags he has from his church; an organization I evaluate extra of a racist club that a Christian business organization. even even if it really is theoretically Christian is continues to be in reality an anti-American racist crew. If A WHITE candidate belonged to similar for two decades, HE'D be out on his ear in a second. it fairly is HOW we've saved rabid racists Out of the White abode, and enabled racial protection rules to be exceeded. the different significant "luggage" is his spouse! She's of direction racist!! Her thesis, the flaws she says! Her stance on u . s .! How might want to we provide someone like this the communicate board of the White abode, her personal press secretary and the ear of the global press. She'd be a public kin NIGHTMARE. and finally, it looks the Obama kin is frequently matriarchal, hence SHE'S the boss, not him. this is glaring. Hillary now, or McCain in November, a sturdy and dependable American. *****************God BLESS u . s . ******************* NO-BAMA.......ever so some distance as being Mulatto, HE chosen the life-style he wanted to narrate to on his personal. Race makes little distinction, yet in case you lay with canines, you get fleas.
2016-11-27 21:29:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ANSWER: Not all Americans hate GWB
aside from his less popular stance on Iraq, most Americans still agree with his domestic policy, and his active persuits in the war on terror. If it were not for Iraq, he would be the most popular man in the world still.
And yes, he was. After 9/11, and for the two years afterward?
He was Elvis frickin Presley.
All the libs can say is "Iraq Iraq Iraq Iraq Vietnam Iraq Iraq Iraq"
and
"Bush is an idiot"
The Dems are supremely unpopular. Even with the problems Bush faces with Iraq, the Dems are just as unpopular, and Congress as a whole, Reps and Dems, are BOTH more unpopular than the President. Congress really sucks, and EVERYONE agrees on that.
The Reps do nothing. The Dems go right along with it and refuse to lead in their place.
2006-09-17 21:37:50 · answer #5 · answered by askthepizzaguy 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
He was not elected the first time. The GOP managed to sabatage the elections in Florida and got him appointed to presidency by the Supreme court.
The second election had enough fraud in Ohio alone to merit criminal investigations - Underhanded mis management of polling stations and Diebold machines made this happen.
2006-09-18 00:01:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
He stole both elections, it was close as most elections are but the scales were tipped in Ohio with the Dibold voting machines.
2006-09-17 21:56:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
maybe if the donkeys could have come up with a serious presidential canidate last time they would have won that election. if you watched the debates you would have seen that mr. bush was the lesser of two evils. his major victory was his lack of flip flopping. nobody knew what to make of kerry and edwards. some people hated him because of yesterdays opinions, some people hated him because of todays opinions, some people hated his inconsistency, and others voted for him simply because he isnt mr. bush. almost nobdy voted for kerry because they think hes a great guy and would make a great president. if your election slogan is "im not george bush", thats pretty weak.
2006-09-17 21:46:00 · answer #8 · answered by Stand-up Philosopher 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Unfortunately, there are a lot of lemmings in the country who actually fall for Bush's act.
2006-09-17 22:06:24 · answer #9 · answered by brian2412 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Electoral College elects the President not the people
2006-09-17 21:35:00 · answer #10 · answered by King Midas 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋