both they just have different visions for America
while the ignorant neo con will call liberals traitors , the intelligent ones dont doubt their commitment just their methods. Micahel moore the bete noir of conservatism is trying to make america better.
2006-09-17 18:53:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by brinlarrr 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Interesting, The whole liberal- conservative thing is vastly overblown. If these so called liberals wanted Bush out of the white house they could do so very easily by educating America about what really happened on 9/11. Instead you have liberals acting as gatekeeepers. Personally, I tend to be more conservative, but just because Bush says he is a conservative this does not mean the he has acted as one. Traditionally, Republicans have kept us out of foreign affairs,(major wars anyway) balanced the budget. and kept the governemt out of our lives, none of this can be said about the current administration. And when questioned why you can be sure that the answer is 9/11. Well ladies and gentlemen 9/11 is an inside job that was planned and carried out by a rougue/ neoconservative element of our military/Government. Do not, I repeat do not take my word for this. Do the research, what you will find will challange you on everything you think you know about 9/11. I also want to make it clear the this issue has absolutly nothing to with being a democrat or republican, it has alot to with right vs. wrong, fact vs. fiction. Please educate yourself about 9/11 because our constitution is hanging by a thread and the only way to fix the war and everything else that is linked to 9/11 is to demand answers on the issue. A great site with a great bit of info is www.st911.org. This is a group that is made up of many experts, both conservative and liberal, all truth seekers who love their country.
2006-09-18 02:58:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Luke F 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
REMY how can you say "if you're rich", neo-con... really, what are all those crazies in LIBERAL *** HOLLYWOOD? I'd say they are pretty damn rich, and I'm a hard working young lady as is my boyfriend, a hard working Ex-Marine, now an electrician and we are Proud Republicans so don't you dare use labels, that is ridiculous ~ one more thing... 9/11 happened under bush' watch.. what else do you have? You think 9/11 was planned in seven months??? (Which is how long he was in office)... what the hell was your point in that?
to answer the question, i think everyone should be for America... I think they go about it different ways... but if you honestly take a look at the differences, then libs don't care AS MUCH about defending our homeland. I didn't say they don't care at all... i just think not as much. I think they are just more trusting in a way..
2006-09-18 02:12:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on the definition of "for America". If you really listen to many of the voices on here, I think the obvious answer would be the neo-cons (your choice of words, not mine) are for America. The Libs will hate everything about it until they get the white house back. Then they will become the defenders of whoever sits there no matter what he does. The difference to me is that conservative will speak out if they disagree with policy, such as Bush's illegal aliens ideas. But democrats pretty much go for anything their guy does.
2006-09-18 02:03:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cinner 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well if your rich then Neo-Con. If your working class or struggling then Lib's.
Don't let people try to convince you that Neo-Cons are better for our security. Neo-con's armed, trained, financed Bin Laden in the 80's. They also gave weapons to Iran, Taliban, Contras under Bush and Reagan.
The Bush family are great friends to the Saudi Royal family. The same family which has gave millions to terrorist groups.
Bush and the Neo-con's have cut deals with Pakistan. Pakistan is actually a safe haven for terrorism. In fact rumor has it they are trying to cut a deal with Al-Qaeda.
9/11 happened on Bush's watch, despite the fact C.I.A director George Tenant begging the Bush administration to look out for terrorist attacks soon.
Bush Doesn't read the Presidential Daily Brief which says BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE U.S.
And under Bill Clinton I was paying 1.50 for gas and America's economy was so strong that some experts were afraid we were making to much money.
2006-09-18 02:00:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
those that are most for America are those that will go against their own personal prides and beliefs... if it's best for America...
and the VAST majority on both sides are not willing to do this...
Conservatives won't even admit when they've made a mistake and they are far too proud to fix it or allow anyone else to...
Liberals are too busy being angry and not busy enough trying to make things better...
it's time we put America first...
2006-09-18 03:27:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-09-18 02:01:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by jp 6
·
0⤊
1⤋