English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Smoke shot out of the building when it collapsed because of explosion holes.

Steel melts at 3,000 F. degrees, and weakens at 2,200 degrees F.
Jet fuel, burns at 1,800 degrees F.

In 2000, a building in Madrid, Spain was burning for 23 hours. The top 18 floors were completey burnt, yet the whole building still stood.

The two main towers took about 10 seconds to collapse. If one of the floors were weakened, then it should have taken at least a minute to fall.

Security was reduced leading up to the days of the attack, and bomb sniffing dogs were taken out of the building 3 days before the attack.

2006-09-17 16:06:57 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

24 answers

Seems to me that all your facts are accurate.
Is your question about the governments theory?
Because that is certainly not true.
For those who need a recap, the government theory is that 19 Arabs, who had been under surveillance, conspired together, walked onto four commercial aircraft without being detected, and without having their names appear on a passenger list. Then that they overcame over 250 people with plastic box-cutters. And not only that, but with no previous experience of flying large jets, they navigated from 30,000 feet and hit three out of four targets precisely, meantime conducting flying manoeuvres that fighter pilots would find difficult. Then, the amazing thing is that 7 of them survived the events and are known to be alive today.
Also for the first time ever in history, three, not two, but three steel framed buildings collapsed as a result of fire which could not possibly have burned hot enough to melt steel, and caused the buildings not to topple over, as one might expect, or to fall a little at a time, but to fall within their own footprint at the speed of gravity. And one of those buildings (WTC7) was not even hit by a plane.
Not only that, but the four aircraft disappeared completely without a trace of their 16 large engines, or any of the black boxes. This has also never before happened in history.


This theory is so amazingly full of holes that it is impossible for any sane thinking person to believe, yet that is what the official 9/11 commission report.says.


"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
-- William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting, 1981)


All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
For a logical explanation of what happened on 9/11 see below

2006-09-18 00:52:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'll attempt to explain using your science.

Smoke shot out from the compressing gas from the floor collapsing above it. Watch a detonation. The puffs come out with one surge, then stop. The smoke coming out to the WTC was like a jet of air that blew continuously until the floor fell to it's level.

The steel weakens temperature is for unstressed steel. Clearly a steel beam that is cantilevering a floor that is one acre in area is under stress, and susceptible to strain at far lower temperatures. Check your numbers, the 2200 degrees your quoted is for steel that is not under stress. Besides, all of the steel doesn't need to fail, only the joints.

Madrid, Spain was not lit up by several tons of rocket fuel, nor was it designed like the WTC. The fact that it burnt for 23 hours should be enough to convince you that the temperatures were far lower than the WTC. Nothing that is buring well (aka "hot") would take 23 hours to burn. It was clearly incomplete (cooler) combustion, and of course, didn't have a hole the size of a 767 in it.

The towers took over an hour to collapse. The speed of collapse followed the same rules of gravity that anything falling does. As the supporting frame of the WTC opened up, the cantilever support of each of the floors would have already failed by the time the upper building struck it. So no resistance to falling would be met once the collapse started. Nothing would take one minute to fall 1000 feet. Even if it were brought down by explosions, it would still only take 10 seconds to hit the ground. Where did you get the one minute theory?

Security was off and on for a variety of reasons through the life of the WTC. And bomb sniffing dogs were used for trucks and packages, primarily in the basement, not for the buildings beams.

Simply watch any show on TV about detonation. It takes them weeks to prepare, it entails some extremely obvious demolition, and far more "explosives" would be needed than the jets of air you witnessed.

And finally the most obvious point. If there was a consiracy to bring down the towers, why didn't they detonate the bombs when the planes hit, instead of waiting for hundreds of cameras, witnesses, and experts to witness the fall? And why didn't they use "Iraqi" terrorists to justify an Iraqi war? And why didn't Bush do a rehersed action upon finding out instead of the confusion that everyone is so happy to point out. A conspiracy would take thousands, including hundreds of civilians, and yet not a single person says a thing.

You idiots should really stick to Roswell and the Kennedy assasination. At least you have the obscurity of history on your side.

2006-09-17 18:02:44 · answer #2 · answered by freebird 6 · 1 0

I believe the 9-11 Theory. Al Gore was pretty mad that he lost the elections so he planned 9/11 to make it look like Bush was a very bad president. He also paid many of his contacts to push the blame onto Bush, thus making all of these so called 'conspiracies.' Today most actually believe terrorists did 9/11, and the rest believe it was the government. Al Gore decided to stregthen his innocent look by making a documentary about global warming to convince people that after the election he spent too time making his documentary, then to be involved with 9/11. Some people think Al Gore is dumb, but in all actuality he is one of the smartest men to ever live.

2006-09-17 17:40:06 · answer #3 · answered by freemanbac 5 · 0 1

The smoke blew out of the building because the building was falling. Where else could it go. We live in a country where people love to think everything is a conspiricy. The simple fact is that terrorists flew planes with innocent people into the Twin Towers, the Pentagaon, and a field in Pennsylvania. To many people died that day and our Country will never be the same. Please let them rest in Peace.

2006-09-17 16:22:51 · answer #4 · answered by Tammy G 4 · 0 1

Here I go again:
Why believe the explanations and the videos of the conspiracy theorists over those of the government, media and testimonies of those who were there that day? After all, how do we know that those conspiracy theorists are not the real conspirators? How do we know that the likes of Alex Jones are not the cynical master conspirators bent on creating chaos and anarchy? How do we know that their aim isn’t to cause the people to lose faith in their government so that they may attain their nefarious goals?
Besides if the government was going to go through all that trouble to conspire to create 9-11 don’t you think that it would have also been a good idea to plant some WMDs in Iraq?

2006-09-17 16:28:22 · answer #5 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 1 1

The building in Madris didn't have 50 billion tons sitting on it nor did it have FULL tanks of jet fuel. Did I say FULL because they were full. Do you know the degree it burns at? Did you consider the damage to the structure from the plane? Did you consider the fallen weight of other debri on the structure? Lastly the breaking pressure of steal per sq. inch ?

2006-09-17 16:16:04 · answer #6 · answered by We Todd Ed 1 · 1 1

The building structure was made out of an aluminum alloy with a lower melting point.

Child, find something better to do with your time. Stupid rants without any backing are a waste of our time.

2006-09-18 10:04:14 · answer #7 · answered by atlasxxiv 1 · 0 0

Don't you think that the workers in the buildings would have seen someone planting all those explosives?The amount it would take to bring the buildings down could not easily have been hid.The sheep herd appears to be getting larger.

2006-09-17 16:20:35 · answer #8 · answered by stellablue1959 5 · 0 1

The greater i seem on the Kennedy assassination the greater confident I grow to be it grew to become into one guy and that guy grew to become into Lee Harvey Oswald. He had the reason, the means, the possibility and the means. One ballistic attempt after yet another has shown conclusively all the hit photos got here from his sniper place interior the Schoolbook Depository construction and all the "determination" sniper positions (grassy knoll, triple overpass, sewer drain) do in simple terms no longer artwork for one reason or yet another. Had Oswald lived it could have been a slam-dunk conviction and we would not be speaking approximately any of this nonsense today. that's in simple terms Oswald's homicide that fuels this conspiracy crap. 9/11 grew to become right into a conspiracy, it in simple terms did no longer contain the U.S. government, or Mossad or any of that different crap. It grew to become right into a conspiracy of guys of Arab extraction executed as an act of revenge for what they see as American meddling in Arab affairs. i detect the Moon landing hoax conspiracies maximum humorous. Do you notice how lots of the human beings who sell them stay in distant cellular properties surrounded with the aid of cats? Heads of agencies, billionaire's and different effectual anybody is in it for themselves. that's how they have been given the place they are. They artwork for inner maximum benefit and benefit. that's in simple terms human nature. the element approximately maximum conspiracy thought perception is that for the believer it applications very very equivalent to a faith. The believer often starts with the tip, then selections the information to greater healthful that end, distorting, fabricating or ignoring alongside the thank you to make it artwork. it extremely is obviously the alternative of stable scientific inquiry the place you initiate up with the information and enable that convey approximately the tip. perception in a conspiracy is quite much unshakable because of the fact it supplies the believer a feeling of means. they are empowered with secret training - the actual trught - that the the remainder of the unwashed lots have not got or won't settle for. we are all fools on a similar time as in user-friendly terms they understand and understand what's extremely happening. So I often do no longer waste too lots time on those human beings. you are able to no longer argue faith with human beings. yet understand-how the psychology is substantial to understand-how why conspiracy theories are so persistant and familiar.

2016-10-15 02:53:38 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

my brother knew a guy like you and they eventually locked the guy up and tortured him and he was banished to a funny farm with all these other people and they just stood around all day talking about kennedy getting shot and 9/11and eating red jello and taking yellow pills and they sometimes get electric shock with car batteries. the end.

2006-09-17 16:22:03 · answer #10 · answered by lady_bird_2000us 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers