There is no evidence that fires brought the building down, but there is much evidence that it was brought down with explosives.
911truth.org
2006-09-17 15:03:40 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Smoke shot out of the building when it collapsed because of explosion holes.
Steel melts at 3,000 F. degrees, and weakens at 2,200 degrees F.
Jet fuel, burns at 1,800 degrees F.
In 2000, a building in Madrid, Spain was burning for 23 hours. The top 18 floors were completey burnt, yet the whole building still stood.
The two main towers took about 10 seconds to collapse. If one of the floors were weakened, then it should have taken at least a minute to fall.
Security was reduced leading up to the days of the attack, and bomb sniffing dogs were taken out of the building 3 days before the attack.
2006-09-17 16:06:05 · update #1
Please.... this is nonsense. We all saw the airplanes hit the buildings and these were BIG airplanes (Boeing 757 and 767) filled with fuel and going 400 mph or faster. Explosives failed to take the WTC down in the past. You should believe what you saw because it is the truth.
2006-09-17 15:09:21 · answer #1 · answered by pvreditor 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If you look at the buildings falling they fell from the top down, from the heat melting the steel and weakening the structure the building collapsed one floor at a time, each floor gave way, and you could not here any explosion, an explosion would have been heard miles away. any idiot can see how the buildings collapsed if their was an explosion things would have shot out for thousands of feet. Daaaaaaaaaaaaaam!!!! you people are nuts. And any body can make a film and twist facts to make money. I just watched how three guy did it. they did it for the money and for idot people like you.
2006-09-17 15:45:35 · answer #2 · answered by hexa 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've worked in the field of demolition and I watched the news clips of the
Twin Towers and the day they came down. First if you were to look again at where the planes hit the floors they hit almost dead center to the floors that being said it really would'nt take that much to bring the buildings down on themselfs. The structure beams would have been taken out in the hit (center beams) that would leave just the outer beams (already weakened) it really woud'nt take that much pressure to then bring down the building. What little heat there was from the fires would have been enough.
2006-09-17 15:21:45 · answer #3 · answered by Don C 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why believe the explanations and the videos of the conspiracy theorists over those of the government, media and testimonies of those who were there that day? After all, how do we know that those conspiracy theorists are not the real conspirators? How do we know that the likes of Alex Jones are not the cynical master conspirators bent on creating chaos and anarchy? How do we know that their aim isn’t to cause the people to lose faith in their government so that they may attain their nefarious goals?
Besides if the government was going to go through all that trouble to conspire to create 9-11 don’t you think that it would have also been a good idea to plant some WMDs in Iraq?
2006-09-17 15:07:41 · answer #4 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
huh
what are you talking about your a goose
yes there is much eveidence that fire deformes steel frame buildings
did you think that maybe the people sitting in the office would notice someone planting explosives?
did you see a great big plane hit the building?
how much do you think a building is designed to hold extra load?
in ahuge building how much would that cost to over engineer?
why would they over engineer?
face it no building is designed to have a huge airplace hit it at 500 km per hour and then burn many tens of thousands of litre of fuel
2006-09-17 15:14:40 · answer #5 · answered by brinlarrr 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
And I can state that Martians brought down the buildings, put it on a blog, and come up with all sorts of "facts" that are worded and stated in a way to make my "theory" true.
The thing that makes a theory is that it has not been proven. As long as it is a theory, that is all it will ever be.
2006-09-17 15:21:02 · answer #6 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Truth is.......................
What difference does it make when they are still down............
Just a minute, I think airplanes hitting the buildings had something to do with it, and there is fuel that explodes.......hmmm me thinks thousands still died. Perhaps we need to direct planes not to fly into buildings....Shall we put up signs??
My friend when he's driving says "he can do this or that because there's no sign that says he can't> Oh really, there is no sign that says "you are not allowed to run over people or animals....duhhhhhhhh!
2006-09-17 15:20:38 · answer #7 · answered by May I help You? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You do know that engaging brain cells occasionally is good for you. There is tons of evidence in regards to the truth, and you choose to believe the BS. Jeez
Try www.911myths.com
2006-09-17 15:24:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I guess it was a total waste of aircraft.
Oh, I know. The terrorists decided they needed a photo op!
Oh, I know. The pilots were actually unfaithful men, sent on pretext to commercial flight schools, and publicly eliminated as a warning to terrorists everywhere!
Oh, I know.
2006-09-17 15:57:34 · answer #9 · answered by Tommy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Michael, the opposite is true. Conspiracy theorists get an ego boost thinking that they know more than even the experts. Go smoke something.
2006-09-17 15:10:12 · answer #10 · answered by DrB 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋