English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Asked by a bleeding heart.

2006-09-17 12:56:51 · 5 answers · asked by jdnmsedsacrasac1 4 in Politics & Government Elections

5 answers

No. That experiment was tried with Roosevelt. No matter what party he is, no one needs more than 2 terms in office.

2006-09-17 13:04:55 · answer #1 · answered by Dave 5 · 0 0

While I think he was a great President, and beleive that we need someone that would lead our nation in the same direction.

It is important to change leadership every so often for the overall good of the nation.

But I am sure we will get another great leader who will have Christian values that they will continue to follow.
And of course do change this lax policy on immigration and not pass new laws but acutlly inforce the ones we have

2006-09-17 21:54:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

yes if he made it to the election in a heart beat (McCain is a wimp so now way for him) No Dems in sight all they are is hate no ideas. Its a shame because the U.S. needs a strong 2 party system thats what makes the system work

2006-09-17 20:07:06 · answer #3 · answered by retired_afmil 6 · 1 0

Yes I would. I think he has done a very good job as our commander in chief but more importantly I think he should be the one in office when the war in Iraq ends...whether that be now or 10 yrs. from now he needs to be around to see what he accomplished thanks to the U.S. military

2006-09-17 20:05:03 · answer #4 · answered by jlauren0923 2 · 1 1

YES.. He is not perfect but is a good man of principles

2006-09-17 20:06:15 · answer #5 · answered by MeInUSA 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers