To what extent is it accurate to call the American Revolution a civil war?

Answer 1

It is correct to call the Revolutionary war a revolution because the Americans won. However, had George and the boys lost, it would have been a foiled civil war. This is one way to look at it. However, you could argue that there is no justification to call it a Civil War at all. When the colonist won a new form of government was created. The Articles of Confederation (and later the U.S. Constitution) created something entirely new, the country that was created shared little in resemblence to Britain. I think your best bet would be to aruge that comparing the revoultion to Civil War is false as the colonists were not trying to maintain any kind of monarchy or form of British rule at all.

Answer 2

civil war -a war between political factions or regions within the same country
revolution -1. an overthrow or repudiation and the thorough replacement of an established government or political system by the people governed. 2. Sociology. a radical and pervasive change in society and the social structure, esp. one made suddenly and often accompanied by violence.
While I think one could make an argument, based on the number of loyalists (Tories) in the American colonies, it would technically be a revolution, because England had control and the patriots were fighting to release the colonies from that control.

Answer 3

A civil war is one fought between two groups in one country. At the time, America was part of England. Two groups, one country, fighting - makes it a civil war.

Answer 4

no doubt that the authentic that technique of the Civil warfare is thoroughly diverse from the only we are used to. Civil warfare is termed the second one American Revolution by employing some large historians. The time period "second American Revolution" develop into first utilized by employing Charles and Mary Beard about seventy years in the past even as describing the yankee Civil warfare. in basic terms after each and every thing develop into settled about the reunion and reconciliation, after the fashion of monuments were finished, after all the veterans were chuffed, even as quite some the thoughts were boring the Civil warfare might want to were considered from yet another skill, the logical skill that could want to fairly communicate about "that armed conflict were in basic terms one part of the cataclysm, a transitory section; that at bottom the so-referred to as Civil warfare, or the warfare between the States ... develop right into a social warfare, finishing contained in the unquestioned institution of a sparkling skill contained in the authorities, making massive adjustments contained in the affiliation of educating, contained in the buildup and distribution of wealth, contained in the approach commercial progression, and contained in the structure inherited from the Fathers." through the years the time period "second American Revolution" has been considered in a unique way by employing diverse activities. The historians of the Civil warfare era consistently had problems with accepting this time period. after all, Civil warfare a great deal replaced the experience of stability of political skill between North and South and critically accelerated the introduction of commercial capitalism contained in the submit-warfare era. maximum historians see the abolishing of slavery contained in the South because the modern effect of the warfare. yet another attitude is from those that lived by the warfare, they said their warfare as modern. those that lived contained in the South referred to as their rebel a revolution hostile to the tyranny regime of the North. Northerners, in reality, considered their conflict as a warfare to save the union, which develop into formed because the outcome of revolution hostile to England, at the same time. in spite of the undeniable fact that, each and every side considered that warfare because the continuation of their wrestle for freedom that all started in 1776.

Answer 5

It was a civil war...but the media of the time coined the phrase and ran with it...and the rest, well, the rest is HISTORY!

Answer 6

it was between many groups besides the americans and english for example the loyalists where americans fighting the revolutionaries.