English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

so, tell me if this makes sense- this is my theories for what will happen in the seventh book and who all die.

THEORY ONE-I think harry and voldemort will die at the same time-here's why, there are seven horcruxes-one of which is unknown. i think the unknown horcrux is harry. here's why-
when voldy tried to kill him, and left the scar, he left a part of himslef in harry, and here is the exact quote from the second book-
"so voldemort left a part of himself in me?"
"yes harry..."
so, now when harry and voldemort duel (they have to duel, i mean, c'mon, they have to.) voldemort cannot imeadetly kill harry, becuz if he kills harry, he will kill himself, becuz he will kill his own horcrux, and die. and, harry, inorder to kill voldemort, since the horcrux is inside him, he can't just kill voldy. he must kill the horcrux, which means he must kill himself, which will inturn, kill voldy. make sense? tell me your thought

DO NOT ANSWER UNTIL YOU SEE "ADDITIONAL DETAILS"!!
i have more theories.

2006-09-17 11:19:25 · 8 answers · asked by HELP! 3 in Entertainment & Music Movies

THEORY TWO-dumbledores horcrux. here's what-see, i think he may have a horcrux, no this is why. in book one, when harry first reads his wizard card, it says "albus dumbledore...known for defeating the famous wizard grindlewald" defeated. they do not mention any such wizard in azkaban, so it makes sense that albus killed this wizard, and took ADVANTAGE of the opportunity, and made a horcrux. it is not making the horcrux that is the sin, it is the act of killing which tears the soul in two. now, i think the horcrux is in fawkes the phoenix. it makes sense, fawkes never dies, it is reborn from it's ashes, and it is a very graceful creature. so now this supports the theory that he may not be dead .
DO NOT ANSWER UNTIL MORE ADDITIONAL DETAILS

2006-09-17 11:25:38 · update #1

THEORY THREE- dumbledores not dead. phoenix. in everybook, whenever harry is about to die, or something, doesn't it seem like fawkes is always their, to save him, (fawkes has a bit of dumbledore, so it makes sense that he is always around) but when dumbledore dies, fawkes is not around at the time of the death. also, when hagrid is carrying the body to the funeral, they never actually show the body, it's just a piece of cloth. and when there is white smoke coming from the tomb, and the shape of fawkes flies out..could that really be dumbledore? also, when snape kills him, with avada kedavra, dumbledore does not die immeadetly. he flies up and then dies, which never happens when one uses that curse in the previous books. the book concentrates alot on occlumency and non-verbal spells. snape siad avada kedavra, but non-verbally, he is saying another spell, that does not really kill dumbledore, so his death was actually planned, which also supports the theory that snape isnt a deatheater

2006-09-17 11:30:22 · update #2

ok you can answer now. tell me your thoughts!

2006-09-17 11:32:02 · update #3

ok you can answer now. tell me your thoughts!

if you don't believe any of this-go to http://www.dumbledoresnotdead.com

2006-09-17 11:32:33 · update #4

8 answers

thats a good theroy!!
i thought that voldemort might die but someone will die saving harry like Hagrid, Mcgonagal... or even snape, i thought about that since Snape saved harrys life several times already!!!!

but, i didn't think about what you said... that is true, and you know what... you might be right!!!
also, i just relized this... the reason J.K. Rowling isn't going to go onto a 8th book and so on is probably because harry's gonna die... but J.K. Rowling is really good at writing twisted endings so you never know whats going to happen!!!

now your gonna have me thinking for a long time about this.... but you might just be right!!!

your other theroys rock too, i see you have put alot of thought into this and all your theroys could be correct... i don't think dumbledore is dead either so who knows!!!

like i said before.... J.K. Rowling is a really good writer so she's probably going to throw in a few good twists!!

did you hear about J.K. Rowling and that she went to get on a plane and she had the 7th book in her carry on bag and they wanted to check the book but she wouldn't let them because she didn't want any one else to see the book....

I CAN'T WAIT UNTIL THE 7TH BOOK COMES OUT!!!

2006-09-17 11:30:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I thought of the same thing although not the one about Dumbledore so you've got a point. But J.K. Rowling said that Dumbledore is dead and he's not coming back. Sirius, however was never mentioned in that interview so the debate on him is thrown wide open now.

2006-09-17 21:34:26 · answer #2 · answered by Becky 5 · 0 0

you are so right...
and if you remember when harry bought his wand it was the only onw left of that feather and they told him voldemort had the other one...and in the last movie you see the proof that harry has a little of voldemort bcz voldemort came alive with harry's blood...well j.k rowling was saying that harry dies in the last book so I'm guessing voldemort kills him or something related to voldemort kills him...I think this a very extensive topic to talk about so I'd rather before I give you a huge answer...but if u wanna talk about harry potter stuff contact me anytime!

2006-09-17 18:36:25 · answer #3 · answered by SHE'S A DANCING QUEEN ! 4 · 0 0

You're taking kind of long, so I'm just going to say.. I think you are completely right, and I've felt that way from the beginning. It is true that Voldemort is in Harry, and maybe he did it on purpose, and Voldemort is underestimated my the wizarding world. I couldn't have said your theory better myself.

Hey, you have cool theories... I think all of them are right. We'll have to wait until 2007, unfortunately, to find out...

2006-09-17 18:24:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think that you are partially right. Harry and Voldermort will both die as in I believe book six, Dumbledore told Harry that they are equals and one can't not die as long as the other lives or something like that.

2006-09-17 18:22:10 · answer #5 · answered by Lord Draven 2 · 0 1

I have already thought that ever since I read the book. Its become a popular theory now.

2006-09-17 18:21:05 · answer #6 · answered by Norah 6 · 0 1

Your first theory makes sense, but the other two seem a little far-fetched.

2006-09-17 18:34:02 · answer #7 · answered by Quiet Amusement 4 · 0 0

Why do you people read Harry Potter? I really don't understand how you could read something so idiotic.

2006-09-17 18:22:14 · answer #8 · answered by HEY HOW ARE YA 3 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers