batista or the undertaker?
2006-09-17 11:15:22 · 15 answers · asked by PaulBearer 3 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Batista is. He just isnt that good. HHH just made him look good enough to get him over. He cant hold a match by himself. Thats why he is in a program with finlay, to work on his ring skills.
2006-09-17 11:19:39 · answer #1 · answered by just4junk2006 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Batista is young and is a real good wrestler. Undertaker is near the end of his his career, but has been a force for years. Not only has he been a great wrestler, but also a performer. To be honest I don't feel neither wrestler is overrated. They both are good at sports entertainment and what they do!
2006-09-17 18:21:21 · answer #2 · answered by bolddragon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Batista
2006-09-18 00:28:18 · answer #3 · answered by dyna_hd1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Batista off course, the Undertaker has worked hard in the past, that's why he gets to rest now!
2006-09-17 22:22:25 · answer #4 · answered by Young M 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
batista. at least the undertaker is an original. batista is just a big strong dude with no real wrestling moves
2006-09-17 18:27:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Taker
2006-09-17 19:26:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
undertaker
2006-09-17 19:25:21 · answer #7 · answered by Dave B 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
undertaker
2006-09-17 18:17:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
undertaker he sucks now hes too old
2006-09-17 18:17:45 · answer #9 · answered by im so fly 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neither. Both great wrestlers.
2006-09-18 13:38:06 · answer #10 · answered by Sprinkles 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋