I guess he wants his portrait to be next to Pol Pot in the Torture Hall of Fame.
2006-09-17 10:36:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Egroeg_Rorepme 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
You’ve were given this all *** about face. it really is Bush and his gang who're torturing human beings - it really is a contravention of human rights and the structure. you may argue that others do it as a count number of coverage too (Israel for instance) in spite of the undeniable fact that the u . s . are meant to be the sturdy adult men. awaken human beings maximum of you do not realize that he has already replaced the structure and also you at the on the spot are not danger-free as you've been. Bush and his gang can now arrest you on a whim for something in any respect, they could secret agent on you, imprison you without trial and now they are even attempting to make it legal to torture you. that could look some distance fetched yet different notorious fascists were also democratically elected and loved by employing the human beings till all of it were given out of hand. Who? save in concepts Hitler for one. we are in severe difficulty human beings you want to provide up giggling about all this and do a touch actual questioning - the most deadly enemy the u . s . has at present is contained in the White abode.
2016-11-27 20:34:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're a doushe bag. Bush is doing a better job than anyone else in the world trying to stop nuclear warfare. Oh wait, noone else is. If it wasn't for Bush, the world would be nothing more than a vast dessert of radiation.
2006-09-17 10:40:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by tenacious D fan 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Look he is president only for these 8 years. He doesnt care if we are safer or not. He has a huge carnival. And he has done enough for Haliburton that they can take care of him for rest of his term.
If he thinks world is safer, let him go on streets of Iraq for a day all alone. Its soilders who have the courage to stand there. All he has to do is to give orders.
2006-09-17 10:41:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Amrendra 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
14,000 prisoners 'detained' in secret camps all over the world.... without being charged, or without any legal representation. Videotaped torture of prisoners in direct violation of the rules of the internationally-accepted Geneva Convention. U.S. citizens presumed guilty until proven innocent. Over 41,000 Iraqis killed. 3,000 U.S. soldiers killed just because the Bush family has a personal vendetta against Hussein and Dick Cheney wants all that OIL swimming underneath Iraq's sands.
It all smacks of Nazism.
Bush and all his cronies, including all members of the most evil, corrupt, cowardly, incompetent U.S. Congress in American history, should be tried for crimes against humanity, high treason, and murder. If convicted, they should all face public firing squads. -RKO-
P.S. If, indeed, the Bush administration contends that the U.S. will leave Iraq by 2009, or sooner - WHY are we building the largest embassy in the world on 104-acres of prime downtown Baghdad real estate? This monumental facility will house 8,000 employees, features swimming pools, office complexes, shops, auto repair facilities, and its own electric plant! WHY would we build this multi-million-dollar monstrosity if we didn't intend on staying in Iraq for decades and decades?
2006-09-17 10:45:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't believe, but apparently there's a lot of loonies out there who do. Bush screwed us out of our civil rights and liberties with the Patriot Act, and they think he's protecting us! Ha! The joke's on them!
Hell for the rest of us.
2006-09-17 10:39:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by tat2me1960 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Can you believe that Kerry couldn't even beat "moron Bush"? What does that say about Democraps?
2006-09-17 11:16:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by One Bad Mama Jama 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Perhaps you could a better job? PROVE IT! Do something - anything other than use childish name-callings behind your anonymity - and show us!
And, yes, pancake butter cheeks, I believe him! You on the other hand, I do not know a thing about. I'd love to learn, speak!
2006-09-17 10:45:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Moron? I don't really defend much of what he does but Moron? Let's see, he is the President, a Yale graduate, a former governor. And you are ... ?
2006-09-17 10:39:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Only someone who cannot argue a point validly stoops to name-calling. This is hate speech and divisive.
2006-09-17 10:38:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by dhamca 3
·
0⤊
0⤋