The steps were already explained by the first answerer, and the solution is correct. what I want to emphasize is that indeed a(sub)4=0 and as for the other three unknowns, the results are of the form:
a(sub)1=4x; a(sub)2=-3x; a(sub)3=2x, where x can take any value, unless specified otherwise in the exercise.
The solution the manual provides is the particular case when x=1.
That's all. Good luck!
2006-09-17 10:51:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
need help's answer was coming along just fine. This system has an infinite number of solutions, provided the following:
z = 0
w = 2y
x = (-3/2)y
So the solution you have is 1 possible solution. Note that if I choose, for example, a y = 6, I get the following values that will satisfy the system: w = 12, x = -9, y = 6, z = 0. Go ahead and plug them in. They work.
2006-09-17 10:52:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kathy K 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
For any system of linear equations greater than 2 eqs in 2 unknowns, the best method is using Cramer's rule, which derives from the matrix formulations of the equations. First form the determinant of coefficients. In your first equation, the coefficients are 1,2,1,-1; in the second they are 3,2,-3,0; then -4,-4,2,1 and 2,0,-4,0. Form the 4x4 determinant of these coefficients
1..2..2..-1
3..2..-3..0
-4.-4..2..1
2..0..-4..0
Find this value and call it D. To find any of the a1..a4, form a new
determinant from D by replacing the column corresponding to the coefficient of the variable you want by the column of equation values 0,0,0,0 For example for a1 you woule make a new determinant as follows:
0..2..2..-1
0..2..-3..0
0..-4..2..1
0..0..-4..0
(NOTE: you must have an error somewhere, because any determinant with a column of zeros is zero.)
Evaluate this determinant D1, then the value of a1 is D1/D.
Similarly for a2, a3 and a4
2006-09-17 10:43:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by gp4rts 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just because i don't feel like typing all those subs, i'm going to rename asub1 = w, asub2 = x, asub3 = y, asub4 = z. Now..
1st eq: w+2x+y-z=0
2nd eq: 3w+2x-3y=0
3rd eq: -4w-4x+2y+z=0
4th eq: 2w-4y=0
from 4th eq we know w=2y
plugging into 1st eq: 2x+3y-z=0
plugging into 2nd eq: 2x+3y=0
plugging into 3rd eq: -4x-6y+z=0
multiply the revised 2nd eq by -1:
-2x-3y=0
add that to the revised first eq:
-2x+2x-3y+3y-z=0
so z = 0
then we are left with, from the revised 3rd eq: -4x-6y=0, and from the revised 2nd eq, 2x+3y=0, but these two equations give us the same information. so it seems like there is no one unique solution because the equations given were not independent... maybe i did something wrong...
2006-09-17 10:30:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by need help! 3
·
1⤊
0⤋