I asked the experts, and this is what they had to say...
http://www.allexperts.com/user.cgi?m=6&catID=3195&qID=4577952
What do you think about this? Let me know. I personally believe the rulings were wrong, but that's my opinion. Here is an excellent video of it as well. I have to question why Oregon got the football, when you can clearly see that OU got the ball from the onside kick. What do you think?
http://media.putfile.com/Ch9-view-from-behind
2006-09-17 10:18:58 · 4 answers · asked by Autumn_Anne 5 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Let me say this if Oregon gets to a good bowl game because their record is better than the Pac-10 gets more money which means the refs get more money. The refs blew the call and the press needs to blast the refs and Oregon for it. Oklahoma won the game, what I don't like is how Oregonites, I assume they are called, are blasting Oklahoma as a state when Oklahoma has contributed more as a state in the past 10 years that Oregon has as a state. Producing so much of our Natural gas and Oil we might be able to pay the refs to take back their calls.
2006-09-17 10:56:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the refs bet on Oregon saturday!
2006-09-17 17:21:53 · answer #2 · answered by noname 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Money changed hands....no doubt about that.
2006-09-17 17:21:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think your wrong - sorry :(
2006-09-17 17:23:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋