We go on about Darfur(Which is tragic) but an even bigger tragedy is being played out in Iraq. Why do we like the people of Darfur better? Why have UN troops not replaced th Americans (Who are not liked over there?) After all the UN is into conflict resolution is it not? What bigger conflict than Iraq?
2006-09-17 10:15:37 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Answer the question.
2006-09-17 11:32:03 · update #1
Bob kerr anf jacksmum do not understand the question and people with brains are staying away.
2006-09-17 12:22:20 · update #2
Google Falluja and see. " A hugh mushroom cloud was seen above........." Thousands were displaced as in Darfur. What is the difference?
2006-09-17 14:37:32 · update #3
The killing in Fallujah is just exactly the way Dubya, Rumfy, Cheniey and Condi wants it so well let America sort that out.
Darfur is my problem, yours and the rest of the world. The majority of us in this world are gutless and wont pressurise our Government into action until the entire black race in Sudan is oblterated. I cannot really blame America because she's got her hands full in Iraq and trying her best to hide bodybags of American dead soilders returning home to be buried.
It's entirely left to Spineless world leaders like China that's always sitting on the fence and France who dont like fighting wars at all while our country Britain wont lift a finger unless ordered by America.
You watch after the tragic event everybody in the world will as UN to set up an inquiry to see where it went wrong. It's not too late yet to do something now, is it .
2006-09-18 07:48:53 · answer #1 · answered by olayinka o 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The bigger problem is not in Iraq. The problems in Iraq are monumental, to be sure. But the people of Darfur are being raped, murdered, displaced, forced to live in refugee camps, are not being defended by their own government. In fact, their government is complicit in the genocide that is taking place in Darfur. Tens of thousands of Darfuris have died in the last 3 years. How does that compare to Iraq?
2006-09-17 21:21:14 · answer #2 · answered by celticwoman777 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The UN is trying to go in there but the Sudanese government are blocking them. The only way they can go in without permission is by way of a UN resolution. Hopefully this will happen shortly.
2006-09-17 19:04:16 · answer #3 · answered by bob kerr 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the biggest tragedy is that you place a higher value on the lives of the iraqis. both are of equal value. your only wish is to spread your hatred of America, the world's largest democracy.
In both cases the real culprits are the 'insurgents' otherwise known as terrorist mass murderers.
Darfur is the bigger conflict - 300,000 dead, millions displaced.
In Iraq the dead will be less than 100,000. Most of these because of Iran and Syria backing the terrorists.
2006-09-18 09:38:04 · answer #4 · answered by jonnnboy 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They should have sent troops to Iraq 5 years ago to stop Iraqis from killing Iraqi citizens.
2006-09-17 17:43:34 · answer #5 · answered by YahooGuru2u 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are a prick robspier. The overwhelming amount of killings are sunnis and shitties blowing each other up. Dont let the facts get in the way of your bullsh*t ya tit
2006-09-17 17:38:28 · answer #6 · answered by adailton t 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
the sudanese government are refusing them entry- that's what the big issue is and that's why tony blair is asking the UN to push the sudanese government
2006-09-17 17:24:21 · answer #7 · answered by jacksmum 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Many more people are being killed in Darfur ...many many more.
2006-09-17 17:24:28 · answer #8 · answered by Simon K 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No Oil, No Gas.
No issue
2006-09-17 17:23:13 · answer #9 · answered by kamviag 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋