Can you give me opinions on this controdicting theory of the big bang?

Question

If the universe is infinite a point of singularity (Big Bang) never could have unexpectedly occurred.
It would be like drawing a dot on a piece of paper. Except that paper would have to be infinite, and that dot would have to be singularity.

To me that's logically impossible to have something exist in the point of an infinite universe.
Maybe big bangs are happening every where. I think we have it all wrong, I think its something else besides a big bang.
A black hole is formed from one big star collapsing there is no reason that a enormous ball of matter would not collapse furthermore since it has a much greater gravitational pull, and increased density of that of any star.

What I think is that the universe is not infinite at all.
One diverse reason being that even time is made up of particular matter, that co-exists with space

I believe at the end of the universe there is the "stillness of space, and time."
There is more to the theory, but am I missing something crucial

Sthax
Wow!
The universe is that paper its infinite, the dot is singularity were it all started. hahaha.
Since it all started at a singularity, the universe canot be infinite. And the paper can only expanded to the point of where singularity stops. Making a stillness of space exist at the end of the unverse. Yet not the end, just no movment. When you give it movement it becomes space. It's like punching a foam bed except it stop. This means there is an ultra movement of the univeres.

Answer 1

The discovery to your answer will be a Nobel Prize in the future. NOBODY KNOWS where the singularity came from or how it suddenly appeared. Cosmologists at Oxford, Harvard and others have been looking for the asnwer all their lifes, and nothing yet. But not to worry, science and technology in 100 years from now will probably have the answer.

Answer 2

I'd personally have to say that what you are missing is the fact that the Universe isn't a Dot, it's the paper.

Well, really there isn't an acceptable analogy to the beginings of the Universe as we lack the understanding to sufficiently grasp the concept of the nothingness that existed before the Universe. Saying that there was nothing before the universe gives a sense of something existing.

The closest analogy that I've settled on, after looking into quantum molecular physics, is the space (or area) where the electron manages to both exist and not exist.
This incomprehensible (atleast currently) concept of the electron appearing and disappearing is the closest analogy that I can offer to the 'Origins of the Big Bang' and thus it's infinite existance.

Answer 3

The empty space is not so empty. Particles and anti-particles pop into and out of existence. Like relative failures in the absolute logic of Nothingness, or static on a TV screen. It might be that what we consider our universe can have a negative existence in another dimension. Like a bubble under water and a droplet above water. Like the Ying Yang symbol. There is a cause for this Cosmic Static and it is energy. A cosmic potential of existence and non-existence.

Answer 4

Wow, I don't know where to begin with this one. I'll just comment of the "Infinite Universe" part. The universe isn't exactly "infinite." It has a size. There is no "end" of the universe. Think of the edge of the universe like the inside of a sphere. If you keep travelling forward you just keep going around the inside. Just like how there is no "end" of the Earth.