English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In my opinion, he would support neither one, because communist ideology prevents a supreme governor or ruler.

2006-09-17 09:42:59 · 5 answers · asked by -The- Hardcore Thespian 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Please be mature about the topic. Just because he's dead doesn't mean he has not influenced the world.

2006-09-17 09:49:57 · update #1

5 answers

I agree with you on this one.

But I would like to add that this is true in MARX theory only. When his ideology came into practice, the resulting power always amassed into absolute hands. Although, if lenin never died......

2006-09-17 09:50:30 · answer #1 · answered by big-brother 3 · 0 0

He would support absolutism. Maybe Communist ideology in a theoretical sense prevents a supreme ruler in application in aways had one. Communist ideology is not Marx original thought and has been around for 500 years and has always failed because it does not take into account human nature. The Pilgrims after first landing here in the US tried it and almost staved the first winter then they went to another system

2006-09-17 16:57:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He would support V.I. Lenin, because Lenin was against supreme governance or rule. He was a humble man who did not like himself depicted in statues and posters, a man of the people who did not mistreat the driver of his red Rolls-Royce.

Or he might support Fidel Castro, a stranger to supreme governance also. Or Hugo Chavez. Viva la ...whatever.

2006-09-17 16:51:18 · answer #3 · answered by Ren Hoek 5 · 0 0

He's dead, who cares. What would the other marx brothers support?

2006-09-17 16:45:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

KARL MARX IS MY BARBER.

2006-09-17 16:44:34 · answer #5 · answered by john_0502000 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers