bush blows... can't wait til we get a new president.. DEMOCRATS ROCK!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-09-17 09:41:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by sassy_spankie_85_02_04 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
no, I doubt that any party will absorb the Conservatives they will always be here ? And assuming bush is wrong ,what are we going to do ?
nothing because by the time it comes to vote people's memory becomes short term, trying to understand who saying what for which side of the isle .
it would be unrealistic to think that any investigation would be concluded ,that implicates bush in some kind of wrong doing, before his term is up so who ever gets in congress will determine who or what is released to us and if you think the Dem's are going to expose any kind of conspiracy think again they will use any such information as leverage against the republicans and for the country's sake I think it would be the smarter way to go
other wise instead of reading about a civil war in Iraq you ll be hearing a civil revolt on your street in your town and then it will become chaotic and we will all lose the next 5 years to anger hate and greed.
so weather or not the Conservatives admit they were wrong is unimportant what we have to understand is that we need to accept it and prevent it from happening again like with Iran .
2006-09-17 09:57:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by matthew_yelle 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. And I don't expect extremists to become less extreme, either.
But, I do think the majority of conservatives are reasonable people. They can see where things have gone wrong, and where Bush's policies aren't working. His approval rating has plummetted precisely because of this.
I think the majority of conservatives want a more moderate government, just as liberals do. They don't have to become liberals to be able to seek and accept compromise.
2006-09-17 10:01:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by functionary01 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure Dictator Dumbya has done ANYTHING right for the benefit of the broad American population. He is a thief and a criminal... 30 counts says Judge Taylor. Conservatives might want to be humble and outraged against Dumbya who is giving their philosophy, although in ITSELF bankrupt, an even worse name. Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2006-09-17 09:49:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Accusations?
I hardly call FBI and CIA reports "accusations". I hardly call established fact "accusations".
There were no WMD's.
There was no Saddam/Ossama connection.
The perpetrators of 9-11 are in PAKISTAN, and worldwide.
THEREFORE, Bush sent our troops to Iraq under FALSE PRETENSE...each reason he's come up with proven false.
Bush broke 26 U.S. laws spying on AMERICANS.
Bush severly diminished our civil rights, liberties, right to due process (under certain conditions), and our protections from unfair treatment by our government with his mis-named Patriot Act, changing the very Constitution he'd SWORN to uphold and protect.
WHAT accusations? THESE ARE THE FACTS.
2006-09-17 10:58:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by tat2me1960 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oh yeah. it really is why he change into elected two times. He change into drowning black little ones after Katrina too. The pictures change into seized so in worry-free words some individuals pronounced it. He shot Kennedy in 1963 besides. He change into especially youthful although, so that they coated for him. did you recognize his dad change right into a member of Hitler's insiders?
2016-10-16 01:04:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thumbs down!
2006-09-17 09:43:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by thumbsdowndevil 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are true.They are still in denial. They will never accept it.Deny Deny Deny
2006-09-17 09:43:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I personally don't care what political party you are...but when a leader is corrupt he should be indicted ..not defended...America first.
Here a short list of laws he has broken:
50 U.S.C. §1801 et al. (FISA) -- Warrantless wiretapping is illegal if anyone (US citizen or resident alien) is a party to the conversation. Admitted by him on multiple different occasions that the NSA is listening in to conversations where at least one party is in the US. The govt also stipulated to violation of FISA in the ACLU v. NSA case decided last month.
18 U.S.C. § 2511 -- Compliance with FISA "shall be the exclusive means by which electronic surveillance... may be conducted". See above.
18 U.S.C. § 2441: War Crimes as defined under federal law, which include specific violations of articles of the Geneva Conventions. Confirmed in the Supreme Court in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004) (Section II), and Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006) (Section I, confirming §2441 applies).
That's just what he has publicly admitted to, and what federal courts have already confirmed. Other arguable violations:
18 USC 402: Contempt of Court, for unreasonably delay to abide by the Hamdi and related decisions requiring access to counsel.
Also for denial of habeas corpus (see last link, ref section 1005)
18 USC 372: Conspiracy resulting in injury to any officer of the US, where such officer is conducting his lawful duties.
18 USC 371: Conspiracy to interfere with the normal functioning of the government, by signing statements indicating that he will refuse to enforce any law that he doesn't agree with. (last link)
18 USC 1001: Fraud, for making material false statements to Congress, or willfully refusing to provide information to Congress. (last link; see provisions relating to sections 8106 and 8119, et al.)
18 USC 1505: Obstruction, making material false statements to Congress, and for willfully refusing to provide information to Congress (see previous)
Source(s):
[50 USC 180x] http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/u...
[18 USC 2511] http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/u...
[18 USC 2441] http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/u...
[Hamdi] http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ge...
[Hamdan] http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ge...
[ACLU v. NSA] http://www.healer.com/net/aclu-nsa-8-17-... (pdf)
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/...
2006-09-17 09:42:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by dstr 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
liberals have no sense of personal responsibility
2006-09-17 09:47:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have lost track of the actual question here.
2006-09-17 09:42:40
·
answer #11
·
answered by Angela 7
·
0⤊
1⤋