If you weren't such a dolt you would know that there was massive voter fraud during the first election and we diidn't elect Bush, he was appointed as a result of that fraud.
In the second election, he and his handlers used a "fear and smear campaign" to get elected.
See, that is one of the may problems Republicans face ~ severe memory loss...
2006-09-17 09:48:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Angela 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Are you joking? He stole the first election, whether you can admit it or not he stole the first election ok so just get past that and now moving on to the second election.Um Howard dean was the front runner and then one scream and our lying media demonized him as a crazy bastard, then magically Kerry become the front runner even though seriously where did that loser come from? Um now we all know that wesley clark would have made a wonderful president, but the rove smear machine went to work and ******* kerry became the front runner.Basically Kerry was a shill democratic candidate to run against Bush so that Bush could denigrate and mock his charactar call him a traitor then win the election.EVEN THOUGH BUSH NEVER COMPLETED HIS " NATIONAL GUARD" DUTY
2006-09-17 09:47:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
Do you even know what a Liberal is? Besides Bush didn't "win" because he's smart, it's because he's a crook.
2006-09-17 10:12:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
still trying to figure that out, they believe in evolution, so why are apes still here, they believe science can explain everything, ... Job the oldest book in the bible , job states that the earth sits on nothing and spins on nothing, while about the same time Homer stated that the earth sits on a turtles back,,,LMAO they had liberals back then too
2006-09-17 09:58:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by shut up dummy 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because he stole the election and had the supreme court appoint him as KING!
The second election was a fluke because we had 9/11 and that whole dumb psychological 'war time president' bull$hit.
And look who the lesser evil was this time.... Who the hell would vote for him?
NO ONE can defeat the two headed monster party system , NO ONE! They are both equals in corporate bought corrupt government.
2006-09-17 09:46:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
its nothing to do about smart. democracy is abt majority.
its just that majority of voters felt that not letting two guys to marry in San Francisco is more important than soilders and 100000 people dying in Iraq over a lie and to make some people rich.
2006-09-17 09:57:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Amrendra 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I cannot imagine how he has been elected not once, but twice! He is a man of very little intelligence. Obviously being controlled by those with real power--those with the money.
2006-09-17 09:42:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by schweetums 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Because liberals may be smarter but the Republicans fought dirtier.
2006-09-17 09:52:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dunrobin 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
We and the World community are still trying to figure that one out!
2006-09-17 09:41:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by freetinka 1
·
1⤊
3⤋
u need to ask that question.......... coz there's more stupid people than there are smart ones.
2006-09-17 10:09:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by AlfRed E nEuMaN 4 preSIDent 4
·
0⤊
0⤋