English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1) "You shall not bear false witness." George Walker Bush lied about the this war, why it was so absolutely necessary, and its eventual cost. Where exactly are these vast piles of WMD's we were assured Saddam had in quantities that would dwarf even Mt. McKinley and could be unleashed upon us at a moment's notice?

2) "You shall not covet." George Walker Bush is an oil man to the core. He wanted Iraq's oil for his corporate patrons in the boardrooms of Halliburton, Bechtel, Chevron, Exxon, Mobil, and all the other places where the cabal of evil men with very small minds and very black hearts who bankrolled him and continue to prop him up even today reside. These men are evil and he serves them, not God.

3) "You shall not steal." Attacking, invading, and occupying a sovereign nation, a nation that posed no threat to us, never could pose a threat to us and had been essentially disarmed and hijacking its natural resources from its people.

This is exactly what G W. Bush did.

2006-09-17 09:34:53 · 15 answers · asked by freetinka 1 in Politics & Government Politics

4) "You shall honor your mother and father." It can be argued that 's father was less than eager for his son's military adventure in Iraq and tried to hint to the son not to go about it in the way he did. Probably because George Senior realized back in 1991 that we could not possibly conquer Iraq without extremely dire consequences to ourselves and our world standing. Yet George Walker Bush chose to carry out this mad folly against his father's wishes. Therefore he dishonored his father.

5) "You shall not kill." in the process of invading Iraq, over 500 of our soldiers are now dead, thousands of them are now wounded, some permanently, and countless thousands of Iraqi civilians are now either dead or maimed for life. This did not have to happen. War should always be the last resort, only undertaken after all other options are exhausted. Yet George Walker Bush chose to plunge this nation into an endless war whose consequences we are only just now beginning to appreciate.

2006-09-17 09:35:13 · update #1

George Walker Bush claims that he is a “compassionate conservative” without giving much in the way of an explanation of what that means. Time and time again in the Bible, we see Jesus speaking to and ministering to the poor, the beggars, the dispossesed, the homeless. Quite clearly Our Lord cared about these people. He cared about them and ministered to them to set an example to us. We should care about those less fortunate than us. In Matthew’s Gospel, Jesus clearly states what fate shall befall those who do not help the poor (Matt. 25: 41-46).

2006-09-17 09:35:44 · update #2

No, George Bush is not a Christian and those of you who are Christian and are supporters of his need to take a good hard look at who you are supporting and why. He did not win the presidency, he does not deserve to be president, and his life does not reflect the life and teachings of our Lord, Jesus Christ. He does not deserve our support, only our prayers because, based on the stated rules laid down by God in the Bible, George Walker Bush is going to Hell unless he repents of his misdeeds. Be not deceived (1 Cor. 6:9), either you can stand with your liar and reap the whirlwind of shame and disgrace he will inevitably bring down upon himself and this nation or you can renounce him and save yourself.

The choice is yours.

2006-09-17 09:36:14 · update #3

15 answers

There has only been one true Christian. Bush is just a monkey.

2006-09-17 09:38:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

1. Wrong. A main reason we went into Iraq is because Saddam did not allow UN weapon inspectors unfettered access. The UN would not deal with it, so we did. Here is your Iraq War justification. He used chemical weapons on the Kurds. We found missles with some chemical on them. Sen Santorum mentioned this. The old media would not report this. Besides, it is in the past. We are there. We have issues to deal with. What is your plan?

2. We could have drilled for oil in America without using the military. Why would we go to war for that? We have not required the Iraqis to repay us for our help. What are you talking about?

3, Dig your head in the sand, while you are doing that, we will continue to fight the terrorists.

4. Do you know the Bush's? Not likely. You make no sense here.

5. That is right that people die in war. What about the 3000 innocents in 9-11 what did they do? I live in the NY suburbs and know what 9-11 did to this area. Since you make the moral argument, what about all the Iraqis that were killed under Saddam? War was the last resort. We had 19 UN resolutions that were not enforced. What do you suggest? 25. Saddam had no plan to ever honor the agreement.

6. I will explain what compassionate conservatism is. Instead of giving people money ie welfare, we teach others to fend for themselves. The worst thing you can do to a person is give them welfare when they are able to take care of themselves. That is exactly the main part of compassionate conservatism.

7. He won twice. He won fair and square. All liberals do when they lose is blame someone else. After all, how could it be that they did anything wrong. If you ask an unbiased survey, everytime, most of Americans side with Republicans on core party philosophy. The problem is there are too many Republicans who do not share the party's values.

Here is an idea for you, read this again, you will become smarter and certainly more educated.

2006-09-17 09:46:55 · answer #2 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 1 1

1) President Bush did not lie. There were chemical and biological weapons found (about 500 of them). Yes, they were old, BUT Hussein was not allowed to have them. Period. Not only that, but even members of Hussein's former government have admitted that yes, Hussein WAS trying to obtain nuclear technology, and yes, there were more weapons that were shipped out of the country.
Not only that, but it isn't only President Bush who believed that Hussein had WMD's.
2. If it was only about the oil, we would have sent at least 450,000 soldiers in, completely taken over the country, and raped it dry. As it is, we are not. Does this mean that having Iraq as an ally isn't going to give us an economic boost, especially with them being so rich in oil? No. Of course not. Strategically, economically, and politically "invading" Iraq can be a good thing, if we allow our soldiers to do their job.
3. Goes along with two. We are NOT stealing Iraq's oil!
4. Former President Bush realized that NOT deposing Hussein was a bad idea. Besides, since when does the president have to obey his parents when it comes to doing his job?
5. It's called war. If you're going to hold President Bush accountable for those deaths:
FDR is responsible for nearly one million American soldiers' deaths, not to mention all of the civilians who were killed when we bombed them.
Truman is responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Kennedy and Johnson are responsible for 58,000 soldiers' deaths, and countless civilians.
Nixon is responsible for the three million throughout Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam that were slaughtered after we pulled out.
Shall I continue?
Being a Christian does not make one perfect. A president has to make hard decisions. Truman stayed up all night, and then gave the command to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Does that make him any less of a man? Of course not.
Yes, civilians have been killed in Iraq, and it's horrible. But you know, posts like these aren't helping the 160,000 soldiers who are there RIGHT NOW doing their job.
There is so much that we armchair generals don't know about the war. All we know is what the news chooses to tell us. That goes for the supporters, and the protesters. I've learned that there is only one source I can depend on: Those who are there. I listen to them, not the news. I don't support OR protest the war. I simply believe in the fine men and women who choose to serve our country. I also believe in the man who sent them to do their job, even though sometimes I disagree with him.

Oh, and for the record, President Bush WON BOTH ELECTIONS. Don't like it? Tell the DNC to run better candidates.

2006-09-17 09:51:24 · answer #3 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0 1

Actually chemical weapons were found! What quantity of mustard gas would be enough to satisify you? You ignore the evidence that is right under your liberal nose.

Wow we're getting Iraq's oil? That must be why gas is $.99/gal!? Do you have proof of this? Of coarse not! Oil is one of Iraqs only sources of income and their production thus far isnt meeting the demands of their country.

Youre right though, GWB is stealing from Iraq!!!! uhh... Whats he stealing again? Sand? We invaded Iraq because we were sick of Saddam defying UN Security Council resolutions concerning chemical weapons and after 9/11, both the congress and democrats felt that Iraq supplying chemical weapons to terror groups was a risk we couldnt afford to take.

Get your facts straight and stop bashing our president and his faith just because he doesnt do what you liberals want him to do!

2006-09-17 09:49:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

God is actual, and has been revealing himself to each race, way of existence and united states of america interior the worldwide. So if path human beings worldwide and in all distinctive situations have found out issues approximately him. And, ask your self, often they are the comparable issues. (humorous how distinctive human beings can seem at something actual and notice the comparable element). each faith has bits and areas of the certainty. some greater suitable than others. yet no one faith grew to become into able to get all of it good. God is in simple terms too vast and too complicated and too overwhelming for guy to make your strategies up. That why He had to return to earth himself, interior the variety a guy named Jesus, to finally get to the full revelation of Himself to mankind. So of path you will discover issues in Christianity and different non secular that are the comparable. they are in line with something actual.

2016-10-15 02:37:05 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Wow! You America Haters are really getting experienced.
Lying comes natural to you. But you're not very good at it.
Those are all old lies and already been disproven.
Maybe you Muslims really believe those lies in your country .
But American Muslims know you're lying.

2006-09-17 09:40:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

I hope the god you believe in is Allah, my friend.

You sound ready to submit and kneel before the muslim fascist hordes. Enjoy your beheading.

2006-09-17 09:40:59 · answer #7 · answered by thealligator414 3 · 3 1

I am a Democrat but I do not begrudge Bush's religious beliefs.

2006-09-17 09:37:19 · answer #8 · answered by Angela 7 · 1 2

Because , This man is a great christian and a man of God. He is a very good leader and I do not think he is lieing about being a christian.

2006-09-17 09:37:52 · answer #9 · answered by veta1313 2 · 4 4

I don't think he has the intellectual capacity to even discuss his religion or the moral capacity to live his life in a "christian" manner.

2006-09-17 09:39:01 · answer #10 · answered by schweetums 5 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers