I don't think that Dumbledore would ask Snape to kill him because he considers killing the ultimate act of evil. He said that Voldemort underestimates the value of an intact soul, so I doubt that he would ask Snape to kill when it would tear his. I think he was begging Snape not to return to his evil ways as an active Death Eater. Dumbledore died attempting to save Draco, Snape is returning him to Voldemort, that is going against Dumbledore's efforts.
I do think that Harry will return to Hogwarts at some point and will get advice or information from Dumbledore that will help him, either from his portrait or a memory saved in a bottle that he can experience through the pensieve.
Dumbledore is dead! J.K. Rowling has said this herself. That and no one comes back from the dead in her stories. He wouldn't create a Horcrux - it would go against everything we know about him. He is a good guy and wouldn't perform such Dark Magic, which would require him to kill someone. He also said that "death is the next great adventure" which sounds like someone who doesn't fear death.
Harry has already attempted to contact Sirius using the 2-way mirror, in Order of the Phoenix. He concluded that Sirius didn't have his with him when he died, when he was unsuccessful. It has been confirmed that the 2-way mirrors will come into play again in Book 7, by the way.
No, I don't think that Voldemort made his wand a Horcrux. He uses his wand, which puts it at risk for damage. Horcruxes are created to protect a piece of one's soul, so it will probably be something that will be hidden for safe keeping (like the ring hidden in an obscure location and the diary which he left with Lucius, a powerful Death Eater.) I suspect that R.A.B. will turn out to be Sirius's brother Regulus Black and that the locket at 12 Grimmauld Pl. was the Slytherin heirloom that Voldemort made into a Horcrux. I don't think that Harry is a Horcrux either. It would be unwise to make a Horcrux out of any living creature. I don't think Voldemort would risk it, even with Nagini. He'll have chosen inanimate objects of historical value, like Slytherin's ring and locket or Hufflepuff's cup.
I think that the Ravenclaw Horcrux will be the tiara that was in the Room of Requirement in Order of the Phoenix. Harry noticed it when he was looking for a place to hide the Half-Blood Prince's potions book. I'm betting that Draco will redeem himself by helping Harry in the final book. I don't think that he will become a good guy, or friends with Harry, just that they will make an alliance. It will be a "an enemy of my enemy is my friend" sort of thing because they both want to be rid of Voldemort. I think the Hogwarts house elves will join the fight against Voldemort. We'll probably lose one of the Weasley's, I think it will be George. Fred and George said that they didn't care about the Order when Arthur was attacked, he was their only concern. Fred would be outraged if George were killed and would join the war against Voldemort with earnest. And each of the deaths of good characters has been someone who Harry is fond of (his parents, Cedric - a romantic rival but someone he admired, Sirius, Dumbledore) and near death experiences have included people he cared about too (Hermione, Ginny, Ron, Arthur) so it would fit the pattern.
2006-09-19 02:49:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kami 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
So what is your question. I don't agree that Dumbledore told Snape to kill him so that Voldermort wouldn't find out Snape is a spy. Read the second chapter of the book six all over again. Snape tells Malfoy mother and aunt he is a spy for Voldermort feeding information to the Dark Lord about Dumbledore.
If you remember at the end of Book 5, Harry has a conversation with the ghost that is mascot to the Gryffindor house. In the conversion the ghost tells Harry no one who crosses the red veil ever comes back. Also if you remember Harry threw his mirror across the room and shattered.
Also, I agree that Sirsius's Brother Remus did steal the locket from the Dark Lord and it is at 12 Grimmauld Place.
Harry will return to Hogsworth but to do battle with the Dark Lord there. In my opinion the school has become to dangerous and the governors of Hogsworth will want the school close.
As for Harry I think he is more of a Horacxes than Fawks is because if you remember in the last chapter of the second book in the series. Dumbledore tells Harry only a true Gryffindor can pull that sword out of the sorting hat and here is an essay that was written on that very subject read and see if you agree with it.http://www.hp-lexicon.org/essays/essay-stag.htmlhttp://www.hp-lexicon.org/essays/essay-is-harry-a-horcrux.html
2006-09-17 11:24:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gail M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree about Snape, not sure about the rest - yeah Dumbledore wouldn't have had a horcrux.
I know J.K. isn't going to write anymore, but I always thought it would be cool to see a young Dumbledore. Like it says on his chocolate frog card, "Dumbledore is most famous for his defeat of Grimwauld in 1945" or something like that - Dumbledore vs. a dark German wizard? In the middle of WWII? Awesome! If he'd ever made a horcrux it would have been out of that guy.
I think the 2-way mirror was only put in to hammer home the irony of the way Serius died. If Harry had realized he could have contacted him at any time....
Voldemort wouldn't have made Harry into a horcrux- that would go entirely against what Vold. heard of the prophesy, which clearly calls for Harry's death.
The problem with the locket still being at #12 is that Mundungus made off with it, right? So it could be anywhere. Harry will have to find him and shake it out of him - and it's sure to have not ended up anywhere good.
2006-09-17 09:10:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If Harry is a Horcrux, he's in serious trouble because Horcruxes have to be destroyed -- but he can't be a Horcrux, can he, because Voldemort keeps trying to destroy him.
There is something significant in Harry's returning to the place his parents died, Godric's Hollow -- because Godric was the first name of the Hogwarts founder Gryffindor. I read an interview with JK Rowling and she agreed that this was significant but would not say why.
2006-09-24 12:21:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by nesheekah 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
wow,lot of thought.yes,harry can talk to D's portrait at d now Headmistress office,surely Mcgonaggall talks to old Dumbledore!also,she'd want harry's advice,n harry must receive more dark arts coaching fr whoever,he can't face voldie an expert w. no ammo ready..
also,he must really train in magic n b v powerful,mcgonagall helps,so may d order members.hermione be a great asset to harry=intelectually n a great moral/emotional supprt.
snape is evil anyway,so is malfoy..no redemption for them,someone good i gonna finish them off.hermione?
2006-09-20 03:52:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Hermione J.Potter 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Browse my Q+A i got kool answers and i believe that mybe just maybe that is the horcux in grimmauld place - read my question on it ,
2006-09-17 09:24:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
He will be consumed by Sunny bit-by-bit, but only after Violet and Klaus have fun torturing him in their crazy ideas and contraptions.
2006-09-17 09:10:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Shangri-La 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I like the archway idea.
2006-09-17 09:04:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ralph 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
no because if he lost it or misplaced it it would have been lost and harry might have died or been expeled and dies as snape ecplaned in the 6th book.
2006-09-17 09:07:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by sagotaru 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think perhaps the author has her own ideas...
2006-09-17 09:04:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by WitchTwo 6
·
2⤊
1⤋